Yeah...
I definitely think it should be 2.3.0/3.0.0
Kinda like what WSDL did with 1.2/2.0.
:)
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Johan Edstrom" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:21 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 2.3.0 probably shoud've been 3.0.0
I think 2.3.0 also encompasses more changes in the API, i.e you need a
little bit of a transition guide.
On Oct 25, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Robert Liguori wrote:
Just FYI...
Considering the overview of of Apache CXF 2.3.0
(http://cxf.apache.org/apache-cxf-230-release-notes.html), I really think
that this build should have been 3.0.0, but that's just my opinion. I
believe a lot of the support libraries were also updated. Here's the
text from the web page describing the updates:
"Apache CXF 2.3.0 is a pretty significant upgrade from the 2.2.x series
of releases. There are plenty of new features and other improvements
including:
a.. JAX-WS 2.2 Support
b.. JAX-RS 1.1 Support
c.. New annotations of java first use cases
a.. @WSDLDocumentation annotation to add documentation nodes to
generated wsdl
b.. @SchemaValidation annotation to turn on schema validation
c.. @DataBinding to set the databinding used (if other than JAXB)
d.. @GZIP to turn on GZIP compression
e.. @FastInfoset to turn on FastInfoset support
f.. @Logging to turn on and control various Logging functionality
g.. @EndpointProperty to configure endpoint properties
h.. @Policy to associate WS-Policy documents with the service
d.. SOAP/JMS spec implementation
e.. SDO databinding
f.. Schema Validation support for Aegis Databinding if Woodstox 4 is
used for the Stax parser"
Anyone agree?
Johan Edstrom
[email protected]
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
