Are you deploying the example into an OSGi platform?
If so there may be some issue, I will have a look at it if I get some
time tomorrow.

Willem

On 10/27/10, Stephane Nicoll <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I started from the base and thought the samples would answer my original
> issue. I downloaded the official apache-cxf 2.3.0 distribution from
> apache.org, had a look and found all kinds of reference to
> "org.mortbay.jetty". If I try to run these samples, I am getting an obvious
> ClassNotFoundException since Jett7 is used.
>
> However, jax_rs\basic_https is working fine and I copy/pasted the
> cherryServer.xml in my project but jetty does not seem to start.
>
> What am I missing? Especially since the same config works just fine with
> 2.2.11 (and Jetty 6)
>
> S.
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Willem Jiang
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> There is no other different configuration on the jetty7 to start the
>> embedded server.
>> Can you take a look at the CXF 2.3.0 system tests, we didn't face that
>> kind
>> of issue before?
>>
>> BTW, what's address that your service was published?
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/10 4:14 PM, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are trying to upgrade our application from 2.2.10 to 2.3.0 and we're
>>> facing an issue with embedded Jetty7
>>>
>>> We have a set of unit tests starting CXF with an embedded jetty. First we
>>> had to rename some classes since the move to eclipse but the real issue
>>> is
>>> that while CXF states it has deployed our Web Service, all the unit tests
>>> are failing with a ConnectionException now.
>>>
>>> Do you have a working setup somewhere of embedded jetty with unit tests
>>> and
>>> cxf 2.3? I had a look to the doc but it does not seem up to date in that
>>> area.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> S.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Willem
>> ----------------------------------
>> Open Source Integration: http://www.fusesource.com
>> Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>>         http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/willemjiang
>>
>

Reply via email to