Hi Sergey
Thanks for the answer

So for a "quick" solution with the existing version we have to unpack
the single bundle distribution and patch the required files or build
our own version from the maven repository ?

2010/11/23 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>:
> Hi Michael, David
>
> sorry for a delay. At the moment it is basically impossible to reuse the
> low-level CXF Jetty configuration; perhaps some configuration can be done at
> the pax level.
> We;ve been talking about the possibility of enhancing the DSW so that it
> could also load existing CXF configuration resources where some bits which
> are not easily expressible via intents can be configured.
> I might give it a go - but I'll need to find some time for working on it...
> cheers, Sergey
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Michael Illgner <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No one with an idea ?
>> How can I increase the number of worker threads in the embedded server ?
>>
>> 2010/11/22 David Bosschaert <[email protected]>:
>> > Hi Michael,
>> >
>> > I have never tried this at all and this might very well fall into the
>> > area where Sergey suggested to provide external configuration to
>> > DOSGi.
>> > Sergey would you have any thoughts here?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> > On 22 November 2010 10:18, Michael Illgner
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Hi folks
>> >> I am using the version 1.2 single-bundle-distribution for exposing an
>> >> OSGi service as a webservice and it is working like a charm. But I
>> >> have some difficulties configuring the embedded jetty server, e.g. for
>> >> increasing the number of worker threads, possible incoming
>> >> connections, using HTTPS etc. I have found this documentation
>> >> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jetty-configuration.html but I do not
>> >> understand how to apply this information for the single bundle
>> >> distribution.
>> >> Do I have to unpack the distribution files and change some of the
>> >> "internal" files (default-web.xml) ?
>> >> Is there any simple example for jetty configuration available ?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in advance
>> >> Michael
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to