On Tuesday 07 December 2010 5:20:58 pm Jeremy Robertson wrote: > I am now getting the policy populated in the WSDL, but it's showing up > twice:
No idea. Can you create a small test case and file a bug? Dan > > </wsdl:port> > </wsdl:service> > <wsp:Policy wsu:Id="UsernameToken" > xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702" > xmlns:wsp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy" > xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecur > ity-utility-1.0.xsd"> <wsp:ExactlyOne> > <wsp:All> > <sp:SupportingTokens> > <wsp:Policy> > <sp:UsernameToken > sp:IncludeToken="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/07/securitypolicy/Incl > udeToken/AlwaysToRecipient"> > <wsp:Policy><sp:WssUsernameToken10/></wsp:Policy> > </sp:UsernameToken> > </wsp:Policy> > </sp:SupportingTokens> > </wsp:All> > </wsp:ExactlyOne> > </wsp:Policy> > <wsp:Policy wsu:Id="UsernameToken" > xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702" > xmlns:wsp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy" > xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecur > ity-utility-1.0.xsd"> <wsp:ExactlyOne> > <wsp:All> > <sp:SupportingTokens> > <wsp:Policy> > <sp:UsernameToken > sp:IncludeToken="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/07/securitypolicy/Incl > udeToken/AlwaysToRecipient"> > <wsp:Policy><sp:WssUsernameToken10/></wsp:Policy> > </sp:UsernameToken> > </wsp:Policy> > </sp:SupportingTokens> > </wsp:All> > </wsp:ExactlyOne> > </wsp:Policy> > </wsdl:definitions> > > The reference to the policy also appears twice under wsdl:binding... > > I have the following annotation: > @Policy(uri="wsPolicy.xml", includeInWSDL=true) > @WebService(...) > @SOAPBinding(...) > public interface MyService { > > Any ideas why it is being duplicated? > > Thanks, > Jeremy Robertson > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:48 PM > To: Jeremy Robertson > Subject: Re: using @Policy to populate WSDL > > On Tuesday 07 December 2010 2:38:30 pm Jeremy Robertson wrote: > > Adding that import did the trick. Thanks! > > <import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-policy.xml" /> > > Added to the docs. Thanks! > Dan > > > Jeremy > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:04 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Jeremy Robertson > > Subject: Re: using @Policy to populate WSDL > > > > > > What does your spring config look like? Are you importing > > META-INF/cxf/cxf-extension-policy.xml ? > > > > > > Dan > > > > On Tuesday 07 December 2010 1:17:03 pm Jeremy Robertson wrote: > > > I am trying to use @Policy to add security information to the WSDL, but > > > so far it does not seem to have any effect. > > > > > > Here is what I have specified: > > > @Policies({ > > > > > > //@Policy(uri="resources/wsPolicy.xml", includeInWSDL=true) > > > @Policy(uri="wsPolicy.xml", includeInWSDL=true) > > > > > > }) > > > > > > I have tried specifying this on individual methods as well as on the > > > service interface. I also tried enabling the policy framework > > > (<p:engine enabled="true" ignoreUnknownAssertions="true"/>). > > > > > > I tried placing the referenced wsPolicy.xml both in the resources > > > folder (src/main/resources), and also in the site root. > > > > > > I am not seeing any errors or warnings about not being able to find the > > > policy file or about it being invalid (although it may not be valid at > > > this point)... As far as I can make out, the annotation is being > > > ignored. > > > > > > I am currently using CXF 2.3.1, Spring 3.0.5, and Maven. > > > > > > Can anyone give me any further guidance on what I need to do? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jeremy Robertson > > > > > > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended > > > > > > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. > > > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is > > > prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the > > > sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog
