Here is the soapui output in question

With 2.3.1

<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
   <soap:Body>
      <ns2:loginResponse xmlns:ns2="http://account.external.gameaccount.com/
">
         <_return>
            <response>
               <code>0</code>
               <description>SUCCESS</description>
            </response>
            <value>MTI5M</value>
         </_return>
      </ns2:loginResponse>
   </soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>

with 2.3.0

<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
   <soap:Body>
      <ns2:loginResponse xmlns:ns2="http://account.external.gameaccount.com/
">
         <return>
            <response>
               <code>0</code>
               <description>SUCCESS</description>
            </response>
            <value>MTI5M</value>
         </return>
      </ns2:loginResponse>
   </soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>

Y.

On 8 December 2010 16:58, Yiannis Mavroukakis <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry, stupidly forgot to include more info about my setup. I am seeing
> this on the deployed service, I use a code first approach, so it was simply
> a case of updating the version on my pom, recompiling and firing up the
> service. If you need anything specific to debug this I'd be happy to help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yiannis
>
>
> On 8 December 2010 16:53, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 11:45:15 am Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I updated from 2.3.0 to 2.3.1 today, and I noticed that the <return>
>> > element has changed to <_return> any particular reason for this?
>>
>> No idea really.   Is there any way to create a small test case?
>>
>> The only thing that really was done around this is with the wsdl2java tool
>> and
>> java2ws tools (is that where you are seeing this), we did a better job of
>> endorsing the jaxws/jaxb 2.2 stuff.   If this is just a runtime thing,
>> then
>> that really wouldn't apply though.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [email protected]
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>
>
>

Reply via email to