On Thursday 16 December 2010 12:58:11 pm Markus wrote:
> Hello Freeman, hello Daniel,
> 
> thanks a lot for your help.
> 
> I added a lot of bundles to my containter:
> 35    ACTIVE      org.eclipse.jetty.io_7.2.2.v20101205
> 36    ACTIVE      org.eclipse.jetty.http_7.2.2.v20101205
> 37    ACTIVE      org.eclipse.jetty.util_7.2.2.v20101205
> 38    ACTIVE      org.eclipse.jetty.continuation_7.2.2.v20101205
> 39    ACTIVE      org.eclipse.jetty.server_7.2.2.v20101205
> 40    ACTIVE      org.eclipse.jetty.security_7.2.2.v20101205
> 41    ACTIVE      org.eclipse.jetty.servlet_7.2.2.v20101205
> 42    ACTIVE      org.eclipse.jetty.xml_7.2.2.v20101205
> 43    ACTIVE      org.apache.geronimo.specs.geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec_1.2.0
> 44    ACTIVE      org.apache.geronimo.specs.geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec_1.0.0
> 45    ACTIVE      org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jetty-bundle_6.1.24.2
> 46    ACTIVE      org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-api_0.8.1
> 47    ACTIVE      org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-spi_0.8.1
> 48    ACTIVE      org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-runtime_0.8.1
> 49    ACTIVE      org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty_0.8.1

Can you also try adding 
org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-jsp
org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-extender-war
org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-extender-whiteboard
org.ops4j.pax.url/pax-url-war

I know for TSF, we had some issues getting things to properly deploy without 
those even though we don't use the war based things.   Haven't really 
investigated why.

Dan



> 
> With this jetty is started, port 8080 is opened as desired and the log
> output changed in a promising way.
> But unfortunately the web service ist still not available on
> http://localhost:8080/cxf/CustomerServicePort?wsdl or other URLs I tried:
> 
> HTTP ERROR: 404
> Problem accessing /cxf/CustomerServicePort. Reason:
>     Not Found
> Powered by Jetty://
> 
> Adding the transportId to jaxws:endpoint in beans.xml does not lead to any
> improvements.
> 
> I didn't find the time to investigate TSF, but from what I read on your
> blog and the web site is sounds very interesting and promising. I will try
> it out tomorrow.
> 
> Please let me know if you have more suggestions for my current container.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Markus

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://dankulp.com/blog

Reply via email to