Adding @FormParam("") to a FormBean method parameter is all what is neededCheers, Sergey On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote: > Sergey, > > Here was my brainwave: > > Consider a bean-pattern class with ... > > class FormBean { > void setFrog(String frog) { ... } > void setSnake(String snake) { ... } > } > > And then a form with fields named 'frog' and 'snake'. What sort of > JAX-RS device would we need to write that could map the form field > names to the bean accessors? If the function was, perhaps, > setSnake(String[] snakes), then it would take all of the multiple > values if there were multiple values. > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Benson > > > > Ideally @Consumes is specified, but it is not strictly required. > > If it is not then providers will be asked in turn if they can > > handle reading into a given object, > > JAXBElementProvider will say yes if its class is XmlRootElement > > annotated/etc. > > > > In your case, it is a form submission, so given that no @Consumes is set, > > all providers are checking the bean and just don't accept it.You can add > a > > @FormParam("") annotatation and it will fix it. > > > > Adding @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED) should've fixed > it > > too, but it won't, unless you use MultivaluedMap as a method parameter. > > Would make sense enhancing a form provider a bit - will look into it a > bit > > later > > > > Sergey > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Benson Margulies < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > >> I am really not understanding why the page of examples shows a > >> function that takes a single bean argument and has @POST on it. Is the > >> idea here that someone would POST with content-type, oh, XML? > >> > >> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Benson Margulies < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > So, using some jquery magic, I'm sending a POST, and getting back a > >> > 415. I have no @Consumes annotation at all. I've specified a bean as > >> > the parameter to the method, on the theory that the form params will > >> > be reflected into the bean. How many things have I got wrong here? > >> > > >> > > > -- Sergey Beryozkin Application Integration Division of Talend <http://www.talend.com/> http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
