Hi

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2011 1:57:48 PM Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Well, but why is the trailing > omitted?
>
> Looks like a bug:
>
> Line 159 of Attachment Util:
> id = "Content-ID: <[email protected]";
>
> Likely something is  wrong around there.   The best option is probably to move
> the "decode" into the above "if" and set the id to just
> [email protected] or something at that point.
>

OK, I think that if should also be changed a bit, to move the check
for '<' inside of the if block, because replacing Content-Ids which
may not have angle brackets with default values seems not right

> And "Content-ID: " definitely shouldn't be there.
>

Benson - can you please get the list of Attachments from MultipartBody
and check individual Attachment headers ?
How is Content-ID reported ? Or is it how you found about malformed
(default) Content-IDs in the first place ?

> Can you log that (and maybe fix it)?

Benson created JIRA and I'll look into it. That should not affect
multipart/form-data requests much as @Multipart and
MultipartBody.getAttachmentObject will also check Content-Disposition,
but has to be fixed anyway.

Cheers, Sergey

>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> >> I'm just posting a form from Chrome. Note the strange content-id,
>> >> which is the same in all of my attachments. This is with 2.4.0.
>> >>
>> >> {Content-Disposition=[form-data; name="file"; filename="cmp.patch"],
>> >> Content-Type=[application/octet-stream], Content-ID=[Content-ID:
>> >> <[email protected]]}
>> >
>> > CXF probably defaults to <[email protected]> on the input ?
>> > The format is a bit strange all right, but I think Content-Id is
>> > actually OK, you can get the list of headers and Content-Id in
>> > particular from Attachment objects and confirm
>> >
>> > Cheers, Sergey
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected]
> http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to