On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:40:43 PM David L wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> I am using the default constructor of the client.
> I guess the default will just take the wsdl location and servic name from
> the wsdl file.
> 
> Then I call client.getXYZWsdlABCWSPort() to get the ABCWSPortType object. //
> getXYZWsdlABCWSPort() is generated by CXF, and it takes no arg. I am not
> using the getPort(QName portName, Class<?> clazz).
> 
> Then I got the exception.
> 
>  Does this answer your question?

Unfortunately, yes.  :-(

I have no idea what would cause this then.   Is there any chance of providing 
a test case that we could debug?

Dan



> 
> Everything was working last Thursday, before my colleague update the wsdl.
> I test the NEW wsdl with soapUI, everything is fine, but not the CXF
> generated stub.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> David
> 
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > CC: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: Unable to create
> > JAXBContext Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:35:40 -0400
> > 
> > On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:31:47 PM David L wrote:
> > > Hi Dan,
> > > 
> > > I can't even get to the point where I can make a ws call.
> > > I generated the stub, create a client, and get the port type object,
> > > then I got the exception. Does this answer your question?
> > 
> > Well, not really.   How are you creating the client to create the port
> > object? There are several ways to do that so I need to know which.    I
> > full stack trace MAY also be helpful.
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > > Best regards
> > > 
> > > David
> > > 
> > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > CC: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: Unable to create
> > > > JAXBContext Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:54:18 -0400
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Do you have an example testcase for this?    When using the
> > > > JAX-WS
> > > > frontend, it  definitely should trap these extra methods.    If
> > > > using
> > > > the simple frontend with these methods, I could definitely
> > > > understand
> > > > this error as it wouldn't know to remove the JAX-WS specific
> > > > methods.
> > > > 
> > > > Dan
> > > > 
> > > > On Monday, June 13, 2011 5:35:45 PM David L wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I got the following errors when I try to get WS port from
> > > > > the CXF
> > > > > generated stub.
> > > > > 
> > > > > java.security.PrivilegedActionException:
> > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.IllegalAnnotationsExcep
> > > > > tion: 4
> > > > > counts of IllegalAnnotationExceptions
> > > > > javax.xml.ws.AsyncHandler is
> > > > > an interface, and JAXB can't handle interfaces. this problem
> > > > > is
> > > > > related to the following
> > > > > 
> > > > > location:
> > > > >         at javax.xml.ws.AsyncHandler
> > > > >         at public javax.xml.ws.AsyncHandler
> > > > > 
> > > > > org.ws.stub.jaxws.SomeWSMethodAsync.asyncHandler
> > > > > javax.xml.ws.AsyncHandler does not have a no-arg default
> > > > > constructor. this problem is related to the
> > > > > 
> > > > > following location:
> > > > >         at javax.xml.ws.AsyncHandler
> > > > >         at public javax.xml.ws.AsyncHandler
> > > > > 
> > > > > org.ws.stub.jaxws.SomeWSMethodAsync.asyncHandler
> > > > > java.util.concurrent.Future is an interface, and JAXB can't
> > > > > handle
> > > > > 
> > > > > interfaces. this problem is related to the following location:
> > > > >         at java.util.concurrent.Future
> > > > >         at public java.util.concurrent.Future
> > > > > 
> > > > > org.ws.stub.jaxws.SomeWSMethodAsyncResponse._return
> > > > > java.util.concurrent.Future does not have a no-arg default
> > > > > constructor.
> > > > > 
> > > > > this problem is related to the following location:
> > > > >         at java.util.concurrent.Future
> > > > >         at public java.util.concurrent.Future
> > > > > 
> > > > > org.ws.stub.jaxws.SomeWSMethodAsyncResponse._return
> > > > > 
> > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > 
> > > > > David
-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to