No, I haven't tried it at all yet. I'm really asking if this is considered a common or reasonable practice. The idea here being that an input parameter to a service function might be a URI, and then it would work seamlessly in the attachment case by using a cid: uri. I haven't even looked into what CXF API I would call, if any, that might help me find the right attachment, or whether I'd code my own loop over the parts.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>wrote: > Do you see any problems with "cid:" links ? > > Cheers, Sergey > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Has anyone ever seen the use of 'cid:' uris sent in JSON packages of a > REST > > service to refer to data in an attachment? > > >
