I just wanted to get users opinions on: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3741
Basically, right now, we ship just the 6 individual jetty jars that we need for the various CXF features (and we likely should ship the jetty mgmt jar as well to make 7). These 6 jars are defined as deps in the appropriate pom so maven grabs them, etc... The proposal is to use and ship the jetty-all jar instead so all the Jetty features are available to use. It reduces the jar count, but increases the size a little bit. There are 3 options: 1) Leave things as is. 2) Only use jetty-all 3) Leave things as is in the pom so maven users are unaffected, but ship the jetty-all in the distribution/lib dir. I'm leaning toward #2 for CXF 2.5. Simple reason is that if someone wants to use the individual jars, they can exclude a single jar and add the others as a dep for their app. With #1, if they want jetty-all, they have to exclude a bunch of deps to add jetty-all in. I'm personally not a fan of #3, but thought I'd list it. :-) Thoughts? -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
