On Monday, August 29, 2011 3:41:41 PM KARR, DAVID wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Well, I guess the right answer really is that you should not use a
> > single port
> > to issue concurrent requests if you want to be spec compliant.   Either
> > create
> > a port per thread, use a pool of them, or synchronize on one so that
> > the port
> > is only ever issuing a single request at any given time.   The spec
> > does NOT
> > provide any guarantees of thread safety of a port/proxy.   An
> > implementation
> > may or may not be thread safe to use that way.      If you want
> > portable code,
> > do not assume the port is thread safe at all.
> 
> Sigh.  Ok.
> 
> Just to be clear, does CXF manage to provide a thread-safety guarantee for
> the port, despite what the spec says?

Within the limit outlined in the faq, yes:

http://cxf.apache.org/faq.html#FAQ-AreJAXWSclientproxiesthreadsafe%3F

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to