Sergei : my apologies - and thank you for the correction !! i completely agree with you , for the input what we have currently suffices ( even adding of prefixes within cxf chain interceptors poses no threats as jaxb impls in cxf do what's required! )
You abzolutellly Rock!!! if you ever do make it to the bay-area i would love to get you coffee/lunch and meet up with you to pick your brains! regards -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/cxf-2-4-0-pattern-match-StaxTransformFeature-tp4381005p4816957.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
