Tested latest 2.4.3-SNAPSHOT - no problem with mustUnderstand any longer!
Great stuff!

2011/10/3 David Karlsen <[email protected]>

> Will test that - just adding some stuff from the spec as well to complete
> it:
>
> Please see: 4.2.3:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383500 .
>
> So it seems that a service provider must in fact accept this header - but I
> cannot find a way to define it in our schemas - but will test the fix
> anyway.
>
>
>
> 2011/10/3 Daniel Kulp <[email protected]>
>
>>
>> Just a quick update to mention I chatted with David on IRC:
>>
>>
>> http://irclogs.dankulp.com/logs/irclogger_log/cxf?date=2011-10-03,Mon&sel=132#l128
>>
>> and figured out a possible fix that he'll test tonight.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Monday, October 03, 2011 5:06:02 PM David Karlsen wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > We have (generated) wsdl's that look like this:
>> >     <message name="SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0Req">
>> >         <part element="impl:SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0InputArgs"
>> > name="SECSSecurityTokenCreate_V1_0RequestIn"/>
>> >         <part element="edb:AutHeader" name="SoapHeader"/>
>> >     </message>
>> >
>> >
>> > the edb:AutHeader is defined in another schema - and does not have any
>> > mustUunderstand attributes.
>> >
>> > My question is not directly CXF but rather WSDL1.1 based - am I as a
>> service
>> > provider obliged to accept this header? And if so I guess the attribute
>> > should be defined in the schema as well?
>> >
>> > I've read the specs but I didn't get a clear answer from reading them.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> [email protected]
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
>
>


-- 
--
David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen

Reply via email to