Hi colm The wresult parameter as part of the ws-federation spec requires the rstr instead of the security token.
Shall I use the class Element to pass the required claims? Thanks oli Von Samsung-Tablet gesendet Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> hat geschrieben: Sure, I'll review any patch you care to submit. Why do you need the full RSTR instead of the security token? Colm. On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Oliver Wulff <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there > > I'd like to double check with you whether it's ok to enhance the STSClient > thus it can be used for subclassing. > > My use case is: Implementation of an identity provider (for WS-Federation > passive requestor profile) which is a web application and calls the new CXF > STS server. In this case, I need the full RSTR instead of the security token > only. > > I can't subclass as a lot of methods and setter/getter members are private. > > Do you mind that I change that to protected? > > Further, I must be able to pass the claims within the RST element instead of > within the secondary parameters. Do you mind that I enhance the STSClient to > set the claims on the STSClient class? > > Thanks > Oli > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh http://coheigea.blogspot.com/ Talend - http://www.talend.com/apache
