Hi Dan,

Finally I have seen that my problem wasn't related with node names, but
with policies. My Soap request, needs a policy that I see it's not
implemented in CXF, concretely, policy '
http://www.bea.com/wls90/security/policy'. I use the Weblogic policy as
explained in:

http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11035_01/wls100/webserv_ref/sec_assert.html

<wsp:Policy WL5G3N1:Id="SignBody"><wsp:ExactlyOne><wsp:All><wssp:Integrity
SignToken="false"><wssp:SignatureAlgorithm URI="
http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/><wssp:CanonicalizationAlgorithm
URI="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/><wssp:Target><wssp:DigestAlgorithm
URI="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"/><wssp:MessageParts Dialect="
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/2002/12/wsse#part";>wsp:Body()</wssp:MessageParts></wssp:Target><wssp:SupportedTokens><wssp:SecurityToken
IncludeInMessage="true" TokenType="
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0#X509v3
"><wssp:TokenIssuer>
...

In order to be able to handler that policy, should I define this policy in
CXF source code? In that case, is there some how-to, doc, etc. explaining
how to implement it? Or am I wrong and there is some other easy solution?

Thanks,

Pep


2011/11/22 Daniel Kulp [via CXF] <[email protected]>

>
>
> If using CXF 2.5.0, you can handle this a LOT easier if you just want to
> ignore those policies.   You can add a bean in the configuration somewhat
> like:
>
>     <bean
> class="org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.IgnorablePolicyInterceptorProvider">
>         <constructor-arg>
>             <!-- the list of assertion types that can be ignored -->
>             <list>
>                 <bean class="javax.xml.namespace.QName">
>                     <constructor-arg value="http://tempuri.org/policy"/>
>                     <constructor-arg value="Duplex"/>
>                 </bean>
>                 <bean class="javax.xml.namespace.QName">
>                     <constructor-arg value="http://tempuri.org/policy"/>
>                     <constructor-arg value="OneWay"/>
>                 </bean>
>             </list>
>         </constructor-arg>
>      </bean>
>
> which will tell the runtime to automatically assert those assertions.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 9:35:14 AM pep25abril wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I've generated with wsdl2java, a client to invoke a webservice placed in
> an
> > Oracle OSB. The WSDL definition, has ws-security properties, and it uses
> > standard assertions (<wsp:Policy>, <wsp:UsingPolicy>, ...) and others
> that
> > are generated automatically like <WL5G3N0:binding>.
> >
> > Once I execute my client in order to invoke the server, I always get the
> > error:
> > Caused by: org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: None of the policy
> > alternatives can be satisfied.
> >
> > I've been seeing forums and others, and finally I've included a
> > policyinterceptor in order to assert the policies, as it's said in
> >
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Adding-custom-ws-policy-assertions-td558439.
>
> > html .
> >
> > The problem is that when I get the message in handler method, when I
> execute
> > 'aim = message.get(AssertionInfoMap.class);', aim always gets null
> value...
> > so I can't assert any policy later.
> >
> > I think I have used almost all the alternatives I have seen in docs,
> apache
> > CXF website, other forums, etc. without succes. Would you have any idea
> or
> > suggestion about this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Pep
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Getting-error-None-of-the-policy-alternativ
> >
> es-can-be-satisfied-and-no-possibilities-to-solve-it-tp5014166p5014166.html
> > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5014931&i=0> -
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Getting-error-None-of-the-policy-alternatives-can-be-satisfied-and-no-possibilities-to-solve-it-tp5014166p5014931.html
>  To unsubscribe from Getting error 'None of the policy alternatives can be
> satisfied.' and no possibilities to solve it, click 
> here<http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5014166&code=cGVwMjVhYnJpbEBnbWFpbC5jb218NTAxNDE2NnwxMzc1MjMzMjA1>
> .
> NAML<http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.InstantMailNamespace&breadcrumbs=instant+emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>


--
View this message in context: 
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Getting-error-None-of-the-policy-alternatives-can-be-satisfied-and-no-possibilities-to-solve-it-tp5014166p5020741.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to