On Monday, February 13, 2012 2:45:04 AM Jens wrote:
> > Yes and no.    The issue is that the WSDL is claiming an HTTP transport,
> > but
> > you are setting a JMS transport.   When this happens, internally, a few
> > things
> > get reset to defaults and, in this case, the attachments are lost.
> > Unfortunately, I'm not really seeing any way of working around the issue
> > right
> > now.  :-(    The only thing you can do is copy _bind/BindingHTTP.wsdl  to
> > _bind/BindingJMS.wsdl, update the tranport string in there and change the
> > name
> > of the binding, and update the service entries to include a JMS port.
> > That
> > should allow it to work fine.
> 
> Dan,
> 
> thanks for that. Using a WSDL with a JMS binding does indeed make it work.
> 
> Should I file a bug for this issue?


Yea.  Please do so.   That way it won't get lost.   Attach your test case as 
well if possible.

Thanks!

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to