On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 06:52:41 PM COURTAULT Francois wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the feedback :-) > According to the issue, it should be fixed in the 2.5.3 release: right ? > When this version will be released ?
Likely in a couple weeks. We did a release on Jan 25th and we normally shoot for about every 8 weeks or so. Dan > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: mardi 6 mars 2012 18:36 > To: users@cxf.apache.org > Subject: Re: Aware of compatibility issue between CXF and Metro/Weblogic ? > > It's an issue in CXF: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4166 > > I'll merge a fix shortly. > > Colm. > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:13 PM, COURTAULT Francois <francois.courta...@gemalto.com> wrote: > > Hello Glen, > > > > The two issues (WSIT-1490 and WSIT-1590) you mention seem not related > > to the issue I have got :-( I am not using STS (WS-Trust) at all: > > - WSIT-1490: no SAML used in the KeyIdentifier with a #uuid in > > the SOAP request. - WSIT-1590: no encoded email in the SOAP request. > > > > Best Regards. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:gma...@talend.com] > > Sent: mardi 6 mars 2012 15:20 > > To: users@cxf.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Aware of compatibility issue between CXF and Metro/Weblogic > > ? > > > > There's a couple of problems that seem to be on Metro's side > > (http://java.net/jira/browse/WSIT-1490, > > http://java.net/jira/browse/WSIT-1590) affecting interoperability > > between the two stacks. It would be great if these were fixed, as > > both Metro and CXF are better off the more interoperable they are with > > each other. Feel free to vote for these two issues. :) > > > > Glen > > > > On 03/06/2012 07:03 AM, COURTAULT Francois wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have tried to write a CXF client which talks to a WSS protected > >> (X509Token) webservice hosted in Weblogic (Metro based) but > >> unfortunately I got a Soap fault error. > >> > >> If I compare a soap request which works and the one generated by CXF, > >> the only difference I have seen is that in the<dsig:KeyInfo> > >> <wsse:SecurityTokenReference> section, I have a<wsse:KeyIdentifier> > >> section in the one which succeeded whereas I haven't this section in > >> the CXF one. > >> > >> Any advice ? Any idea ? > >> > >> Best Regards. > > > > -- > > Glen Mazza > > Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com > > blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
