Yes that's correct, the class generated in the correct package is an empty bean. While the class generated in the service package is an exception. Is there a way to have the exception class in the package that I define?
Regards, Néstor Boscán On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Néstor Boscán <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Daniel > > Thanks for the reply. > > I used @WebFault and I'm getting now two exception classes. One empty > exception class in the correct package, and one exception class in the > service package. I would like to have my exception classes generated with > their respective attributes in the correct package. > > Regards, > > Néstor Boscán > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Friday, March 09, 2012 04:11:01 AM Néstor Boscán wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > I'm using CXF that comes with JBoss 6.1.0. I would like to define >> > namespaces for my classes and exception classes. I defined @XmlType >> > annotations for my classes and exception classes but when I publish >> them I >> > only get the namespace for the objects and not for the exceptions. >> >> THe namespace for the faults would be on the @WebFault annotation. >> >> > Is >> > there a way to define this configuration outside the classes? >> >> Not easily, no. You can write a custom subclass of >> org.apache.cxf.service.factory.AbstractServiceConfiguration that maps >> everything any way you want, but that would be quite a bit of work. >> >> >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Néstor Boscán >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >> >> >
