Hi Marko,
Can you please send me the generated FooTo, including the code for the
generated type it extends ?
I'm trying to create a test, seeing
com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.IllegalAnnotationsException: 1 counts of
IllegalAnnotationExceptions
javax.xml.bind.JAXBElement does not have a no-arg default constructor.
this problem is related to the following location:
at javax.xml.bind.JAXBElement
at
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.JAXBElementProviderTest$BookJAXBElement
where BookJAXBElement is typed as follows:
public static class BookJAXBElement extends JAXBElement<Book> {
protected final static QName NAME = new QName("Book");
public BookJAXBElement(Book value) {
super(NAME, Book.class, null, value);
}
public BookJAXBElement() {
super(NAME, Book.class, null, null);
}
}
Thanks, Sergey
On 14/06/12 16:13, Voß, Marko wrote:
Hello Sergey,
Thank you. I've added an issue for this: CXF-4380
Maybe the description there is better than in my last mail.
Best regards,
Marko
Am 14.06.2012 17:04, schrieb Sergey Beryozkin:
Hi Marko
On 14/06/12 14:48, Voß, Marko wrote:
Hello,
I think, I know the problem.
I have written an example like this:
---
FooTO foo = new FooTO();
JAXBContext context =
JAXBContext.newInstance(foo.getClass().getPackage().getName());
// this context looks like the context from AbstractJAXBProvider:438 (both
support the same types)
context.createMarshaller().marshal(foo, outputStream);
InputStream in = /* make inputstream from outputstream */
context.createUnmarshaller().unmarshal(in) // works
context.createUnmarshaller().unmarshal(new StreamSource(in), foo.getClass()) //
fails because FooTO is not known to
this context
JAXBElementProvider uses the StaxReader as the first argument.
CXF is using the second unmarshalling behavior.
Any ideas, how to get around this?
Try setting an extraClass[] property, that should do it. I'll fix it in
meantime.
By the way:
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-rs-advanced-xml.html#JAX-RSAdvancedXML-XMLProcessingInstructions
Perhaps that can let you to avoid providing a custom provider
Cheers, Sergey
Best regards,
Marko
-----Original Message-----
From: Voß, Marko [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 3:13 PM
To: Sergey Beryozkin; [email protected]
Subject: RE: JAXBElementProvider not able to deal with specific type of classes?
Hello Sergey,
I've updated from CXF 2.5.1 to 2.6.1.
We are using our own JAXBElementProvider, which extends from
JAXBElementProvider in order to add a xml-stylesheet to
the top of the returned XML.
I had to change the code from:
MyJAXBElementProvider extends JAXBElementProvider
To:
MyJAXBElementProvider extends JAXBElementProvider<Object>
Otherwise the code could not compile because of the overridden method
setMarshallerProperties.
Maybe it has something to do with this? I doubt that.
I was performing a manual un-/marshalling of this kind of class and it worked.
I have no idea what is wrong here. Both
JAXBContext instances have the same output for toString().
Best regards,
Marko Voß
ePublishing& eScience
Development& Applied Research
Phone +49 7247 808-744
Fax +49 7247 808-133
[email protected]
FIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1
76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
www.fiz-karlsruhe.de
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Voß, Marko
Subject: Re: JAXBElementProvider not able to deal with specific type of classes?
Hi Marko
On 14/06/12 12:29, Voß, Marko wrote:
Hello,
(CXF v2.6.1)
We have, say, a JAX-RS interface like this one:
---
@Path("/foo")
public interface Foo {
@Path("/bar")
@POST
@Consumes(MediaType.TEXT_XML)
@Produces(MediaType.TEXT_XML)
JAXBElement<BarTypeTO> doSomething(FooTO); }
---
FooTO is a class of the following structure (generated by JAXB-Maven-Plugin):
---
public class FooTO extends JAXBElement<ExampleTypeTO> {
protected final static Qname NAME = new Qname("namespace", "foo");
public FooTO(ExampleTypeTO value) {
super(NAME, ((Class) ExampleTypeTO.class), null, value);
}
public FooTO() {
super(NAME, ((Class) ExampleTypeTO.class), null, null);
}
}
---
ExampleTypeTO represents a schema complexType. Schema:
---
<xs:element name="foo" type="exampleType"/>
<xs:complexType name"exampleType">...</xs:complexType>
---
Now, when performing a request to the endpoint from above, I get the following
exception:
JAXBException: FooTO is not known to this context.
I debugged JAXBElementProvider and the JAXBContext instance knows all classes
from the package of FooTO except FooTO
itself and of course the ObjectFactory, which may be correct but why is JAXB
not able to unmarshal FooTO? This was
working once.
Is there something wrong at line 173-175 in JAXBElementProvider?
I do not actually remember changing anything that may've affected the
processing of classes like FooTO which extend
JAXBElement.
When did it work last time ? May be it is to do with the JAXB impl versions ?
Thanks, Sergey
Best regards,
Marko
-------------------------------------------------------
Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische
Information mbH.
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB
101892.
Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
-------------------------------------------------------
Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische
Information mbH.
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB
101892.
Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
-------------------------------------------------------
Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische
Information mbH.
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB
101892.
Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
