On Friday, July 06, 2012 11:17:59 AM johngalt wrote:
> I was looking for a bit of information from experienced
> users of different java web services frameworks.
> Specifically: CXF, Metro, axis2
> 
> I have an new environment with many different web services: WSDL and REST,
> Java and .NET WCF
> So I've been trying to go through the specfics of each framework to
> determine which is the best
> for my environment.
> 
> Here is what I've found, based on a few hours of googling.
> 
> CXF   - PROS - WSDL and REST  (implements both JAX-WS and JAX-RS)
>       - CONS - Doesn't support WSIT for the WSDL side of things, for WCF/Java
> interoperability

As Dennis stated, WSIT is just Sun/Oracle's imlementation of WS-Security and 
the relates specs.  (Security Policy, Trust, etc...).   At this point, CXF's 
implementaions is actually ahead of WSIT in many aspects (there are things 
like SPNEGO that we now support) and is also more interoperable in others.   
Talend has invested a LOT of time and effort into testing CXF's 
implementation with several different providers, including WSIT, and have 
logged several bugs that we found with WSIT.   



Dan


> 
> Axis2         - CONS - REST support for only GET and POST (seems to use wsdl
> behind the scenes even for REST?)
> 
> Metro - PROS - WSIT support on the wsdl side
>                  - REST support if I include Jersey
> 
> So it seems like CXF or Metro is a good choice, depending on how many wsdl
> services I think
> will be Java/WCF or WCF/Java.
> 
> Any input, opinions, past experiences, corrections, etc, appreciated:
> 
> Cheers
> 
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-Metro-Axis2-tp5710691.html Sent from
> the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to