>From this user's POV, anything security related. For example, we just about to >start using SAML and I am not sure how complete the CXF support is there.
Gary On Jul 24, 2012, at 9:42, "Glen Mazza" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jan. Note WS-MetadataExchange has already been implemented, so you can > scratch that option off your potential list. I don't know about the others, > in terms of which would be most in demand. > > Glen > > On 07/24/2012 05:15 AM, Jan Martiška wrote: >> Hello! >> My name is Jan and I work at Red Hat as Quality Assurance of JBoss >> Enterprise Application Platform, also finishing master's degree next year >> (Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic). >> I was given an opportunity to do a seemingly very interesting diploma thesis >> - implement some missing WS specifications for CXF. I am still not totally >> sure which one to choose off this list: [WS-Enumeration, WS-Eventing, >> WS-Transfer, WS-MetadataExchange, WS-Fragment, WS-EventDescriptions, >> WS-SOAPAssertions], but it was suggested that WS-Eventing is the most >> interesting (but you can try and persuade me to pick another one). >> >> My main question is if CXF community really needs this and if you think my >> code could prove useful and get accepted into upstream. >> I have a formal leader for the thesis (colleague from Red Hat), but I could >> also use someone from the CXF community for some discussions during the >> development- if anyone was willing to help me out, I would greatly >> appreciate that! I might also get some help from some Red Hat committers to >> CXF. >> >> What do you think, anyone? :) >> >> Best regards >> Jan Martiška >> JBoss EAP QA at Red Hat >> Brno, Czech Republic > > > -- > Glen Mazza > Talend Community Coders > coders.talend.com > blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza >
