You might want to look at Glen Mazza's blog - he has number of extremely helpful tutorials including some on SOAP headers (using Handlers). Your generated objects don't require knowledge of the SOAP Header elements.
http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/blog_article_index http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/jaxws_handler_tutorial - Adding JAX-WS handlers to web services and SOAP clients<http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/jaxws_handler_tutorial> *(June 2012) * Hope this helps. On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:06 PM, James Carr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I generated soap stubs with wsdl2java and I am using JAX-WS. The > service I need to call requires soap:header elements to be set but > these aren't exposed in the generated objects anywhere. > > However... they are in the ObjectFactory generated for the elements. > Specifically: > > @XmlElementDecl(namespace = > "http://www.example.com/services/loginservice";, name = > "ClientAccessKey") > public JAXBElement<String> createClientAccessKey(String value) { > return new JAXBElement<String>(_ClientAccessKey_QNAME, > String.class, null, value); > } > > Currently the only way I could figure out how to do this is by doing this: > > List<Header> headers = new ArrayList<Header>(); > > JAXBElement<String> userName = f.createUserName("xxxxxxx"); > JAXBElement<String> password = > f.createPassword("xxxxxxxxxxxxx"); > JAXBElement<String> accessKey = > f.createUserAccessKey("xxxxxx"); > JAXBElement<String> clientKey = > f.createClientAccessKey("xxxxxxxxxxxx"); > > headers.add(new Header(userName.getName(), > userName.getValue(), new > JAXBDataBinding(String.class))); > headers.add(new Header(password.getName(), > password.getValue(), new > JAXBDataBinding(String.class))); > headers.add(new Header(accessKey.getName(), > accessKey.getValue(), > new JAXBDataBinding(String.class))); > headers.add(new Header(clientKey.getName(), > clientKey.getValue(), > new JAXBDataBinding(String.class))); > > > proxy.getRequestContext().put(Header.HEADER_LIST, headers); > > I don't like it... is there a better way? > > > Thanks, > James > -- *Mark *
