Yes, please do. Colm.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:43 PM, ychawla <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Colm, > I agree. It is probably not a good idea by default to add fields like > RequestType however a pluggable way of creating the > RequestSecurityTokenResponse would be great. The schema allows for many > different fields and someone will probably come along next looking to add > something different. > > For now, I just extended TokenIssueOperation and overrode 'issueSingle' and > added my requirements to 'createResponse'. > > Should I log a JIRA on this? > > Thanks, > Yogesh > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-STS-RequestSecurityTokenResponse-and-RequestType-tp5719848p5719862.html > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
