Hi Sergey， >> If yes, there are such test samples in current trunk? >> > Would you consider providing a patch for [1] ? > If yes - I can quickly add the disabled test for you to look at If having more time, please firstly add such a test, secondly, if having not anyone working on the issue, I will try it.
If Release 1.4.0 must be released until the issue is fixed, I really wish that the issue can be fixed as soon as possible. Thanks --Tang Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi > On 20/12/12 03:04, Tang Yong wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> CC: Sergey >> >> I want to confirm that what you said about one open issue is [1][2]? >> >> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-145 > > Yes > >> [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI-140 >> > This is not a regression - we can work on it later > >> If yes, there are such test samples in current trunk? >> > Would you consider providing a patch for [1] ? > If yes - I can quickly add the disabled test for you to look at > > Thanks, Sergey > > >> Thanks >> --Tang >> >> Sergey Beryozkin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> On 14/12/12 08:25, Christian Schneider wrote: >>>> We have one open issue with two jax rs services using different >>>> contexts. I did not yet get to investigate it any further. Apart from >>>> that I think we are ready for a release. >>>> >>>> @Sergey: Do you think we should wait for this or should we do the >>>> release anyway and fix it in a bug fix release? >>>> >>> I'm not able to run WS& RS demos in Felix at all right now, can you >>> please double-check on your end ? The tests are passing but demos don't >>> seem to work >>> >>> The issue I've spotted: JAX-RS POJO handler returns "wsdl" in >>> getSupportedTypes(), just a typo really, so I've fixed it to >>> RS_CONFIG_TYPE, but then I've also spotted getSupportedTypes() is not >>> even used anywhere so may be it can explain the demo issues ? >>> >>> Cheers, Sergey >>> >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> On 14.12.2012 03:45, Tang Yong wrote: >>>>> Hi Team, >>>>> >>>>> I want to ask the time of Apache Distribute OSGi Release 1.4.0. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> --Tang >>> > >
