ok, I will do that today! Thanks for your response. :) On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Freeman Fang <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi, > > I've checked the JAXWS 2.2 spec, the related part is like > > 6.5.3 javax.xml.ws.RespectBindingFeature > > The RespectBindingFeature is used to control whether a JAX-WS > implementation MUST respect/honor the contents of the wsdl:binding > associated with an endpoint. It has a corresponding RespectBinding > annotation described in section 7.14.3. > > ♦ Conformance (javax.xml.ws.RespectBindingFeature): When the > javax.xml.ws.RespectBindingFeature is enabled, a JAX-WS implementation MUST > inspect the wsdl:binding at runtime to determine result and parameter > bindings as well as any wsdl:extensions that have the required=true > attribute. All required wsdl:extensions MUST be supported and honored by a > JAX-WS implementation unless a specific wsdl:extension has be explicitly > disabled via a WebServiceFeature. > > Per the spec, yeah, I'd say this is something CXF should follow, would you > please create a jira to track it? And patch is welcomed, as always. > > －－－－－－－－－－－－－ > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ > Twitter: freemanfang > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com > http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 > weibo: @Freeman小屋 > > On 2013-3-5, at 下午3:36, Min Yang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > When we test our application that enabled the RespectBinding feature, we > > found an issue in cxf-2.6.2. The issue is if we add an invalid binding > > under wsdl:binding element as you can see in below, a WebServiceException > > will be throw out when accessing the endpoint first time, and the > endpoint > > will not be accessed, this is behavior is correct. > > > > <binding name="EchoPortBinding" type="tns:Echo"> > > <soap:binding transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"; > > style="document"/> > > <tns:badBinding wsdl:required="true" uri="http://bad/bad"; > xmlns:wsdl=" > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"; /> > > <operation name="echo"> > > <soap:operation soapAction=""/> > > <input> > > <soap:body use="literal"/> > > </input> > > <output> > > <soap:body use="literal"/> > > </output> > > <fault name="Exception"> > > <soap:fault name="Exception" use="literal"/> > > </fault> > > </operation> > > </binding> > > > > But if we add the invalid binding under operation or its sub element > > (input, output or fault), like the example in below, then cxf will not > > check it, and the endpoint would be access after deployment, although the > > wsdl4j has deserialize it as an unkown element. So I think this should > be a > > cxf defect, please confirm it. Thanks! > > > > <binding name="EchoPortBinding" type="tns:Echo"> > > <soap:binding transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"; > > style="document"/> > > <operation name="echo"> > > <soap:operation soapAction=""/> > > <tns:badBinding wsdl:required="true" uri="http://bad/bad"; > xmlns:wsdl=" > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"; /> > > <input> > > <soap:body use="literal"/> > > </input> > > <output> > > <soap:body use="literal"/> > > </output> > > <fault name="Exception"> > > <soap:fault name="Exception" use="literal"/> > > </fault> > > </operation> > > </binding> > >
