I would want to return a Resource on CustomerService.getOrder(String orderId)
So, in the example you have this:
@Path("/customerservice/")
public class CustomerService {
@Path("/orders/{orderId}/")
public Order getOrder(@PathParam("orderId") String orderId) {
......
}
}
I would like to do it like this:
@Path("/customerservice/")
public class CustomerService {
@Path("/orders/{orderId}/")
public Response getOrder(@PathParam("orderId") String orderId) {
......
}
}
That way a GET on /customerservice/orders/1234 would have custom headers, etc.
However, I would still like to have a sub-resource defined on the Order object
that is the entity in the Resource so that this call works
GET http://localhost:9000/customerservice/orders/223/products/323
So that it calls getOrder(223) first and that returns a Response object with an
entity and that entity is the Order objet. So, next you call getProducts(323)
on that object.
Jason
On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
> On 07/03/13 05:12, Jason Chaffee wrote:
>> I would like to do something similar to the order/product example outlined
>> here:
>>
>> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-rs-basics.html#JAX-RSBasics-Subresourcelocators.
>>
>>
>> However, I would like to have my CustomerService.getOrder(String id) and the
>> the Order.getProduct(String id) return Response objects so that I can
>> customize the headers. However, when I do that, it doesn't seem to work. I
>> have to return the raw entity objects.
>>
>>
>> I would think it could be smart enough to grab the entity object out of the
>> Response object and still find the correct path.
>>
> Do you mean you are actually returning Response from subresource locator ?
> For example,
>
> Path("/")
> public class Root {
> @Path("/sub")
> public Response getSubResource() {
> ...
> }
> }
>
> if not, can you please type an example here ?
>
> In the wiki example, returning Response from Order.getProduct really has to
> work but not if Response returned from CustomerService.getOrder,
>
> Sergey
>
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Jason
>
>
