hi :) No it hasn't because it's an abstract class.
Le 02/05/2013 07:25, Freeman Fang a écrit :
Hi, Does xxx.yyy.myObjectImpl has a default constructor? －－－－－－－－－－－－－ Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 weibo: @Freeman小屋 On 2013-4-30, at 下午3:48, G.Long wrote:Hi :) I'm trying to use a webservice generated with CXF 2.5. The methods of my webservice take an EObject as parameter. The problem is that I always get the following error: javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: Unmarshalling Error: Unable to create an instance of xxx.yyy.myObjectImpl... my model is : (interface) myObject > (abstract class) myObjectImpl > (class) myPObjectImpl I read a lot of topics about jaxb and annotations (using @XmlSeeAlso, @XmlRootElement) but I didn't find the right solution :/ Currently, my interface has the following annotation: @XmlJavaTypeAdapter(myObjectImplAdapter.class). My abstract class has : @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlRootElement @XmlType(name = "myObjectImpl") And the webservice interface has : @XmlSeeAlso({myObjectImpl.class,...}) I don't know if there is something to do with the class myPObjectImpl... Is anything wrong with these annotations? I would like my webservice to use only objects of type myObject. Thank you :)
