Hi
On 03/06/13 19:27, Greg Barker wrote:
How does the transformation feature work if there are more than 1 of the
element being transformed?

For example:

<Container xmlns="http://something";>
     <Parent>
         <Child1>P1C1</Child1>
         <Child2>P1C2</Child2>
         <Child3>P1C3</Child3>
     </Parent>
     <Parent>
         <Child1>P2C1</Child1>
         <Child2>P2C3</Child2>
     </Parent>
</Container>

After using the following:

TransformOutInterceptor transformOutInterceptor = new
TransformOutInterceptor();
transformOutInterceptor.setOutTransformElements(Collections.singletonMap("{
http://something}Child1";, ""));
transformOutInterceptor.setOutAppendElements(Collections.singletonMap("{
http://something}Child3";, "{http://something}Child1=P1C1";));

Here's the XML I end up with:

<Container xmlns="http://something";>
     <Parent>
         <Child2>P1C2</Child2>
         <Child1>P1C1</Child1>
         <Child3>P1C3</Child3>
     </Parent>
     <Parent>
         <Child2>P2C3</Child2>
     </Parent>
</Container>

So it looks like the setOutTransformElements got applied to both Parent
elements, but the setOutAppendElements only got applied to the first. Is
there a way to apply the setOutAppendElements to both Parent elements, each
having a different transformed value? (i also though Child1 would end up
after Child3, not before it)

This feature can not follow complex rules at the moment, though in this case it may work but only of different parents have different namespaces, you'd just add two pairs into the transform map.

We may be able to support a simple XPath like matching in the future, but for now, in cases like this one, XSLT or manual DOM manipulation will do better


I couldn't figure out a way to do that so I started going the XSLT route.
Here's what I ended up with:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
version="2.0"  xpath-default-namespace="http://something";>
   <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
   <xsl:template match="node() | @*">
     <xsl:copy>
       <xsl:apply-templates select="node() | @*"/>
     </xsl:copy>
   </xsl:template>
   <xsl:template match="Parent">
     <xsl:copy>
       <xsl:apply-templates select="Child3"/>
       <xsl:apply-templates select="Child2"/>
       <xsl:apply-templates select="Child1"/>
     </xsl:copy>
   </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>

It seems to work ok using this XSLT testing
utility<http://xslttest.appspot.com/>but it doesn't seem to do
anything at all in CXF using:

XSLTOutInterceptor outInterceptor = new
XSLTOutInterceptor(Phase.PRE_STREAM, StaxOutInterceptor.class, null,
"test.xsl");
config.getOutInterceptors().add(outInterceptor);

Is there something unsupported in that xslt that I'm trying to use?

Likely to do with the actual set-up. Andrei will know,
Cheers, Sergey

Many thanks for taking the time to help me with this, I really appreciate
it.

Greg



On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Andrei Shakirin <[email protected]>wrote:

Hi Greg,

Thank you for your input Andrei. I had been relying on
LoggingOutInterceptor messages to see what the XML looked like so I thought
maybe it was not accurate so I changed it to post the XML to a localhost
endpoint and rely on server side logging to see what the XML payload
looked like. It confirmed the behavior I was seeing before.
Then I tried bumping up my version number from 2.7.0 to 2.7.5 and I am
seeing much different behavior now - it matches how you describe it should
be working. So I guess it was a bug that was fixed at some >point.

Obviously yes.

If I have to specify the element values when I call setInAppendElements,
I guess I'll have to be manipulating the TransformOutInterceptor a lot more
frequently than I had anticipated. Do I also need to handle >escaping of
XML entity characters?

I do not think that you should escape characters,
XMLStreamWriter.writeCharacters() should do it per spec: "However the
writeCharacters method is required to escape & , < and > For attribute
values the writeAttribute method will escape the above characters plus " to
ensure that all character content and attribute values are well formed".

Regards,
Andrei.

From: Greg Barker [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Freitag, 31. Mai 2013 04:56
To: Andrei Shakirin
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Specifying order of XML elements at runtime?

Thank you for your input Andrei. I had been relying on
LoggingOutInterceptor messages to see what the XML looked like so I thought
maybe it was not accurate so I changed it to post the XML to a localhost
endpoint and rely on server side logging to see what the XML payload looked
like. It confirmed the behavior I was seeing before.
Then I tried bumping up my version number from 2.7.0 to 2.7.5 and I am
seeing much different behavior now - it matches how you describe it should
be working. So I guess it was a bug that was fixed at some point.
If I have to specify the element values when I call setInAppendElements, I
guess I'll have to be manipulating the TransformOutInterceptor a lot more
frequently than I had anticipated. Do I also need to handle escaping of XML
entity characters?

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Andrei Shakirin <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Greg,

Sergei is in vacation this week, I will try to answer your question.

transformOutInterceptor.setOutTransformElements(Collections.singletonMap("{
http://something}Child1";, "")) should remove only Child1 element with all
his children.
Not sure why it results removing Parent children, are you sure with that
test?

What you basically need to delete and elements and insert it in different
order is something like this:

transformOutInterceptor.setOutTransformElements(Collections.singletonMap("{
http://something}Child2";, ""));
transformOutInterceptor.setInAppendElements(Collections.singletonMap("{
http://something}Child1";, "{http://something}Child2=Another Value"));

If it not enough you can use XSLT Feature
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/xslt-feature.html to apply any XSLT script to
your request/response.

Other alternative is to create own interceptor, put it to POST_PROTOCOL
phase and sort elements in message payload as you want.

Regards,
Andrei.

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Barker [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Samstag, 25. Mai 2013 02:09
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Specifying order of XML elements at runtime?

Thanks for the quick reply Sergey!

I'm having a bit a trouble with the suggested solution though, almost
certainly a pilot error on my part I assume.

XML before:
<Container xmlns="http://something";>
     <Parent>
         <Child1>Some Value</Child1>
         <Child2>Another Value</Child2>
     </Parent>
</Container>

So I tried:
transformOutInterceptor.setOutDropElements(Collections.singletonList("{
http://something}Child1";));

Which results in:
<Container xmlns="http://something";>
     <Parent>
         Some Value
         <Child2>Another Value</Child2>
     </Parent>
</Container>

Got rid of the element...but not the value. So I tried the "deep-drop"
described on that link:
transformOutInterceptor.setOutTransformElements(Collections.singletonM
ap("{
http://something}Child1";, ""));

Which resulted in:
<Container xmlns="http://something";>
     <Parent/>
</Container>

What am I screwing up? I basically just want to end up with:
<Container xmlns="http://something";>
     <Parent>
         <Child2>Another Value</Child2>
         <Child1>Some Value</Child1>
     </Parent>
           </Container>

Many Thanks!
Greg


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Sergey Beryozkin
<[email protected]>wrote:

Hi

On 23/05/13 22:02, Greg Barker wrote:

Hello -

I'm using the Apache CXF WebClient for a project, and the REST API I
am interacting with has a requirement that XML elements are sent in a
specific order, and "correct" order can change depending on certain
settings that are not known at compile time.

I've found that the XmlType.propOrder annotation allows me to specify
the order in which I want the XML elements to appear at compile time.
This works great. The problem is that I need to be able to change
this order at runtime, and I cannot figure out a way to do that
without resorting to ugly/hacky solutions that modify the annotation
at
runtime.

Is there an easy way to specify XML element order dynamically at
runtime?

  Try Transformation feature:

http://cxf.apache.org/docs/**transformationfeature.html<http://cxf.apa
che.org/docs/transformationfeature.html>

Use outDropElements and outAppendElements properties.

Suppose you have the following produced by default:
<request>
   <a/>
   <b/>
</request>

if needed, you can get <a/> dropped with outDropElements and then
added immediately after <b/> with outAppendElements.

If that has to be set up dynamically then add the feature or its
interceptors from the code, similarly to
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/**transformationfeature.html#**
TransformationFeature-
**Configuringthefeaturefromtheco**de<http://cxf.
apache.org/docs/transformationfeature.html#TransformationFeature-
Confi
guringthefeaturefromthecode>

HTH, Sergey

  Thanks!
Greg







Reply via email to