On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:20 AM, DTaylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Colm,
> 
> Thank you for the information.  Assuming we can get the token out, for
> secure conversation do you have a suggestion of where we should store in
> 2.6.2 so it can be accessed on subsequent calls?  Or was this a significant
> change going forward to 2.7.5?

You can see the change set at:  

https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/cxf?cs=1477656


It wasn't LARGE, but it did add a field to SecurityToken to hold the original 
SecurityContext.  You could likely mimic it by creating a Map<String, 
SecurityContext> or something that is stored on the endpoint that would allow 
you to correlate the SecurityToken id with the original context. 

Dan

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/WS-SecureConversation-and-SAML-assertions-tp5728643p5728957.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to