On 18/07/2013 23:44, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hi Francesco,
I am not 100% sure that is a solution for your case, but I have used Jackson
specific annotation in AbstractSchemaTO:
@JsonTypeInfo(use=Id.CLASS, include=As.PROPERTY, property="class").
Annotation is currently deactivated, because it causes conflicts with Syncope
Spring MVC Rest implementation.
The annotation forces client to send concrete class name in JSON
representation, as a result service has more information to construct concrete
class.
As I can remember, I have tested this code for JSON using CXF JAX-RS client and
service.
Could you try to activate it and retest?
Hi Andrei,
when adding such Jackson annotation to AbstractSchemaTO, the JSON
payload actually adds the expected attribute:
{
"class": "org.apache.syncope.common.to.SchemaTO",
"name": "fullname",
"type": "String",
"mandatoryCondition": "true",
"enumerationValues": null,
"enumerationKeys": null,
"multivalue": false,
"uniqueConstraint": true,
"readonly": false,
"conversionPattern": null,
"validatorClass": null
}
However, this still generates the (same) exception:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.util.LinkedHashMap cannot be cast to
org.apache.syncope.common.to.AbstractSchemaTO
BTW, I have verified via debug that in ProviderBase (ancestor of
JacksonJaxbJsonProvider), the method readFrom() is invoked with parameters
Class<Object> type => class org.apache.syncope.common.to.AbstractSchemaTO
Type genericType => T, with name
""org.apache.syncope.common.to.AbstractSchemaTO"
Regards.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
