On Jul 22, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Jens <[email protected]> wrote: > cschneider wrote >> I don´t think this is possible at the moment. Can you explain your use >> case in detail? > > In this case I receive the request via a JMS "proxy," and the original > ReplyTo queue is inaccessible to my service. Instead I need to send the > reply back to the proxy which will then forward it to the client (this could > be done by keeping JMSReplyTo intact, I suppose, but we're using fixed > queues anyway so that's unnecessary in this case; effectively, the client > could also just not set JMSReplyTobut it's an external source and out of my > control unfortunately).
Shouldn't the JMS proxy then be setting a new JMSReplyTo on the message to one that it can remap? -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
