When you have a WS-SecurityPolicy, you should not use either the WSS4JOutInterceptor or WSS4JInInterceptor. CXF will take care of all of the configuration, providing you supply it with the (e.g) Crypto property configuration and a CallbackHandler, username, etc. Please take a look at the link I posted in my last reply - that configuration works for the client for both outbound + inbound.
Colm. On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:51 PM, <[email protected]>wrote: > OK thank you very much! > I'm getting a little further, but I think I'm running against a problem I > had/made before. But now I get the following error: > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy alternatives can > not be satisfied: > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > }AsymmetricBinding: Received Timestamp does not match the requirements > > Which doesn't supprise me. Earlier in the development proces I had the > problem that I couldn't sign the timestamp. For the outgoing message I'm > using the following: > 1 Map<String, Object> outProps = new HashMap<String, Object>(); > 2 outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.ACTION, WSHandlerConstants.TIMESTAMP > + " " + WSHandlerConstants.SIGNATURE); > 3 //outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.ACTION, > WSHandlerConstants.SIGNATURE); > 4 bindingProvider.getRequestContext().put("password", "xxxxx"); > 5 outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.USER, "xxxxxxxxx"); > 6 outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.SIG_PROP_FILE, > "client_sign.properties"); > 7 outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.SIG_KEY_ID, "DirectReference"); > 8 outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.SIGNATURE_PARTS, "{Element}{ > http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}Action;"; > 9 + "{Element}{ > http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}MessageID;"; > 10 + "{Element}{ > http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}To;"; > 11 + "{Element}{ > http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}ReplyTo;"; > 12 + "Body;" > 13 + "{Element}{ > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd > }Timestamp"); > > 14 WSS4JOutInterceptor wssOut = new WSS4JOutInterceptor(outProps); > 15 cxfEndpoint.getOutInterceptors().add(wssOut); > > The third line I commented out and in the wsdl I commented out > '<sp:IncludeTimestamp/>' (which is wrong, but I could send a message so I > was happy at the moment). If I commented out line 2 I get a error that the > field Timestamp can not be found. > > Is this the cause of the problem above? > I tried to use PolicyBasedWSS4JOutInterceptor instead of > WSS4JOutInterceptor, but I don't know how to push the configuration. > > > > > From: > Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> > To: > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: > 02-08-2013 15:15 > Subject: > Re: org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy alternatives > can not be satisfied: > > > > Ok your configuration is the issue. You are configuring the > WSS4JInInterceptor, which is not policy-aware. You need to configure the > PolicyBasedWSS4JInInterceptor instead. This is done automatically for you > if the WSDL has the correct security policy, but the configuration is done > in a slightly different way. > > For example, see the following configuration: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/systests/ws-security-examples/src/test/resources/org/apache/cxf/systest/wssec/examples/x509/client.xml?view=markup > > > Colm. > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:11 PM, > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Map<String, Object> inProps = new HashMap<String, Object>(); > > inProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.SIG_PROP_FILE, > > "server_sign.properties"); > > inProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.ACTION, WSHandlerConstants.TIMESTAMP > + > > " " + WSHandlerConstants.SIGNATURE); > > bindingProvider.getResponseContext().put("password", "xxxxx"); > > inProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.USER, > > "cs-bedrijven.procesinfrastructuur.nl"); > > > > WSS4JInInterceptor wssIn = new WSS4JInInterceptor(inProps); > > cxfEndpoint.getInInterceptors().add(wssIn); > > > > --- server_sign.properties --- > > > > > > org.apache.ws.security.crypto.provider=org.apache.ws.security.components.crypto.Merlin > > org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.keystore.type=jks > > org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.keystore.password=xxxxx > > #org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.keystore.alias= > > cs-bedrijven.procesinfrastructuur.nl > > org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.keystore.file=globalkeystore.jks > > > > This is how I configure WSS4JInInterceptor. I have no extra config files > > and I prefer to set all config in the code. When the client works I want > > to try to get rid of the server_sign.properties, I want to set that > > dynamic. > > > > Ralph > > > > > > > > > > From: > > Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> > > To: > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: > > 02-08-2013 15:04 > > Subject: > > Re: org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy alternatives > > can not be satisfied: > > > > > > > > As a sanity check, can I see your CXF client configuration? > > PolicyVerificationInInterceptor does run after > > PolicyBasedWSS4JInInterceptor, so maybe you are configuring the > > WSS4JInInterceptor explicilty in your configuration? > > > > Colm. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:26 PM, > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi Colm, > > > > > > He doesn't reach the point you asked for. In > > > 'org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.AssertionInfoMap.java' checkEffectivePolicy > he > > > doesn't find any validated policy, the ArrayList validated is empty, > the > > > ArrayList errors contains 50. He throws at line 179 an exception (cxf > > > 2.7.6). > > > This method is called from > > > 'org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyVerificationInInterceptor' method > > handle. > > > Line 101 is the line where call is done. > > > The variable aim contains: > > > {{http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }SignedElements=[{ > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }SignedElements:false], { > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }RecipientToken=[{ > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }RecipientToken:false], {http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata > > > }Anonymous=[{http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata > > > }Anonymous:false, {http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata > > > }Anonymous:false], { > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}Layout=[{ > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > }Layout:false], > > > AnonymousResponses=[AnonymousResponses:false, > AnonymousResponses:false], > > { > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }AsymmetricBinding=[{ > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }AsymmetricBinding:false], { > > http://www.w3.org/2007/02/addressing/metadata > > > }Addressing=[{http://www.w3.org/2007/02/addressing/metadata > > > }Addressing:true, {http://www.w3.org/2007/02/addressing/metadata > > > }Addressing:true, {http://www.w3.org/2007/02/addressing/metadata > > > }Addressing:true, {http://www.w3.org/2007/02/addressing/metadata > > > }Addressing:true], { > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }InitiatorToken=[{ > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }InitiatorToken:false], { > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}X509Token=[{ > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > }X509Token:false, > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }X509Token:false], { > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > }SignedParts=[{ > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }SignedParts:false], { > > > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy/optimizedmimeserialization > > > }OptimizedMimeSerialization=[{ > > > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy/optimizedmimeserialization > > > }OptimizedMimeSerialization:false]} > > > > > > If you need to know something else, let me know! > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > From: > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> > > > To: > > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > Date: > > > 02-08-2013 12:57 > > > Subject: > > > Re: org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy > alternatives > > > can not be satisfied: > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have access to a debugger? If so could you put a breakpoint in > > > PolicyBasedWSS4JInInterceptor in the doResults method and trace the > > flow? > > > The problem is that some policy is getting unasserted, but I can't > > figure > > > out which one from the logging. > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:53 AM, > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This comes from the WSDL as it is given to me. When generated with > all > > > > three policies enabled, the first is used I believe. I just tried to > > > > generate with only one enabled. I tried three times (one time for > > > > Basic128Rsa15, one time for Basic256Ras15 and one time for > > > > TripleDesRsa15), all the same result as before. > > > > At almost the bottum of the log it says ' LogUtils.doLog(443) | > > > > WS-Addressing - failed to retrieve Message Addressing Properties > from > > > > context'. > > > > Is it possible that I need to add something to avoid this? And if > yes > > > how > > > > do I do that? > > > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: > > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> > > > > To: > > > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > Date: > > > > 02-08-2013 12:34 > > > > Subject: > > > > Re: org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy > > alternatives > > > > can not be satisfied: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if this is the cause of the problem, but the following > > > policy > > > > is not valid: > > > > > > > > <sp:AlgorithmSuite> > > > > <wsp:Policy> > > > > <sp:Basic128Rsa15/> > > > > <sp:Basic256Rsa15/> > > > > <sp:TripleDesRsa15/> > > > > </wsp:Policy> > > > > </sp:AlgorithmSuite> > > > > > > > > The specification only allows you to specify one of the policies > > above. > > > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:44 PM, > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Colm, > > > > > > > > > > The previous message didn't contain a attachement. But in the mean > > > time > > > > I > > > > > managed to get a better log. I will attach it as .txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> To: > > > > "[email protected]" > > > > > <[email protected]> Date: 01-08-2013 10:48 Subject: Re: > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy > alternatives > > > can > > > > not > > > > > be satisfied: > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you turn logging to "FINE" + attach the log? That should > tell > > us > > > > the > > > > > exact policy validation error(s). > > > > > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:17 AM, > > <[email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Because the formatting was crappy an attachement. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> To: " > > > > > [email protected]" > > > > > > <[email protected]> Date: 01-08-2013 10:09 Subject: Re: > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy > > alternatives > > > > can > > > > > not > > > > > > be satisfied: > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like the service is processing the CXF request > correctly, > > > but > > > > is > > > > > > not returning a response that complies with the security policy, > > and > > > > the > > > > > > client is throwing an exception. It's impossible to find out > > without > > > > > seeing > > > > > > the security policy though. It should be in the WSDL file > > referenced > > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > log, if you could attach it: > > > > > > > > > > > > file:WSDL/Aanleveren/Aanleverservice_Digipoort_WUS 2.0 > > > > > > Bedrijven_v1.2_preprod.wsdl" > > > > > > > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:53 AM, > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Colm, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry i didn't see your previous response. Because of my great > > > > e-mail > > > > > > > client (Notus ;) ) I wasn't properly connected to the > > mailinglist, > > > > > > > apologies for the inconvenience. > > > > > > > I don't know how to get the security policy of the service. > > > > > > > I added the message I send to the server. (I've removed the > > > > > SecurityToken > > > > > > > for security reasons). > > > > > > > The message I received is the text I copied from the log. I > also > > > > added > > > > > > the > > > > > > > logging I get at the moment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> To: " > > > > > > [email protected]" > > > > > > > <[email protected]> Date: 01-08-2013 09:34 Subject: Re: > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy > > > alternatives > > > > can > > > > > > not > > > > > > > be satisfied: > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you not see my previous response? We need to see the > > security > > > > > policy > > > > > > of > > > > > > > the service, the request message + the response message to be > > able > > > > to > > > > > > help > > > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:06 AM, > > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear CXF Support, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, I am a newbie with CXF. I am writing a CXF client to > > > > interact > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the government. I am able to send a message. But when I > > receive > > > > the > > > > > > > > response my client crashes. > > > > > > > > Below is the stacktrace. I'm using CXF 2.7.6. I am using > Java > > > > 1.6.45. > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > you need more info, please let me know as I don't exactly > know > > > > what > > > > > > info > > > > > > > > you need to help me. > > > > > > > > Please help me, I'm stuck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ralph Keegstra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These policy > > > > alternatives > > > > > can > > > > > > > > not be satisfied: > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > > }AsymmetricBinding > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > }X509Token > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }InitiatorToken > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }RecipientToken > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }Layout > > > > > > > > {http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata}Anonymous > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy/optimizedmimeserialization > > > > > > > > }OptimizedMimeSerialization > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > }SignedParts > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }SignedElements > > > > > > > > AnonymousResponses > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.AssertionInfoMap.checkEffectivePolicy( > > > > > > > > AssertionInfoMap.java:179) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyVerificationInInterceptor.handle( > > > > > > > > PolicyVerificationInInterceptor.java:101) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.AbstractPolicyInterceptor.handleMessage( > > > > > > > > AbstractPolicyInterceptor.java:44) > > > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept( > > > > > > > > PhaseInterceptorChain.java:271) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.onMessage( > > > > > > > > ClientImpl.java:800) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit$WrappedOutputStream.handleResponseInternal( > > > > > > > > HTTPConduit.java:1592) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit$WrappedOutputStream.handleResponse( > > > > > > > > HTTPConduit.java:1490) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit$WrappedOutputStream.close( > > > > > > > > HTTPConduit.java:1309) > > > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.cxf.io.CacheAndWriteOutputStream.postClose( > > > > > > > > CacheAndWriteOutputStream.java:50) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.io.CachedOutputStream.close( > > > > > > > > CachedOutputStream.java:223) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.transport.AbstractConduit.close( > > > > > > > > AbstractConduit.java:56) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit.close( > > > > > > > > HTTPConduit.java:622) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor$MessageSenderEndingInterceptor.handleMessage( > > > > > > > > MessageSenderInterceptor.java:62) > > > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept( > > > > > > > > PhaseInterceptorChain.java:271) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.doInvoke(ClientImpl.java:530 > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.invoke(ClientImpl.java:463) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.invoke(ClientImpl.java:366) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.invoke(ClientImpl.java:319) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.frontend.ClientProxy.invokeSync( > > > > > > > > ClientProxy.java:96) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsClientProxy.invoke( > > > > > > > > JaxWsClientProxy.java:133) > > > > > > > > at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy34.aanleveren(Unknown Source) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > nl.pfm.wus.aanroep.WUSAanlever.leverAan(WUSAanlever.java:34) > > > > > > > > at > > nl.pfm.wus.aanroep.WUSAanroep.main(WUSAanroep.java:9) > > > > > > > > Exception in thread "main" > > javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: > > > > > These > > > > > > > > policy alternatives can not be satisfied: > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > > }AsymmetricBinding > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > }X509Token > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }InitiatorToken > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }RecipientToken > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }Layout > > > > > > > > {http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata}Anonymous > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy/optimizedmimeserialization > > > > > > > > }OptimizedMimeSerialization > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > }SignedParts > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }SignedElements > > > > > > > > AnonymousResponses > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsClientProxy.invoke( > > > > > > > > JaxWsClientProxy.java:155) > > > > > > > > at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy34.aanleveren(Unknown Source) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > nl.pfm.wus.aanroep.WUSAanlever.leverAan(WUSAanlever.java:34) > > > > > > > > at > > nl.pfm.wus.aanroep.WUSAanroep.main(WUSAanroep.java:9) > > > > > > > > Caused by: org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException: These > > > policy > > > > > > > > alternatives can not be satisfied: > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > > }AsymmetricBinding > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > }X509Token > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }InitiatorToken > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }RecipientToken > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > }Layout > > > > > > > > {http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata}Anonymous > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy/optimizedmimeserialization > > > > > > > > }OptimizedMimeSerialization > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > }SignedParts > > > > > > > > {http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702 > > > > > > > }SignedElements > > > > > > > > AnonymousResponses > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.AssertionInfoMap.checkEffectivePolicy( > > > > > > > > AssertionInfoMap.java:179) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyVerificationInInterceptor.handle( > > > > > > > > PolicyVerificationInInterceptor.java:101) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.AbstractPolicyInterceptor.handleMessage( > > > > > > > > AbstractPolicyInterceptor.java:44) > > > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept( > > > > > > > > PhaseInterceptorChain.java:271) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.onMessage( > > > > > > > > ClientImpl.java:800) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit$WrappedOutputStream.handleResponseInternal( > > > > > > > > HTTPConduit.java:1592) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit$WrappedOutputStream.handleResponse( > > > > > > > > HTTPConduit.java:1490) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit$WrappedOutputStream.close( > > > > > > > > HTTPConduit.java:1309) > > > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.cxf.io.CacheAndWriteOutputStream.postClose( > > > > > > > > CacheAndWriteOutputStream.java:50) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.io.CachedOutputStream.close( > > > > > > > > CachedOutputStream.java:223) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.transport.AbstractConduit.close( > > > > > > > > AbstractConduit.java:56) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduit.close( > > > > > > > > HTTPConduit.java:622) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor$MessageSenderEndingInterceptor.handleMessage( > > > > > > > > MessageSenderInterceptor.java:62) > > > > > > > > at > > > org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept( > > > > > > > > PhaseInterceptorChain.java:271) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.doInvoke(ClientImpl.java:530 > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.invoke(ClientImpl.java:463) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.invoke(ClientImpl.java:366) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ClientImpl.invoke(ClientImpl.java:319) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.frontend.ClientProxy.invokeSync( > > > > > > > > ClientProxy.java:96) > > > > > > > > at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsClientProxy.invoke( > > > > > > > > JaxWsClientProxy.java:133) > > > > > > > > ... 3 more > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Talend Community Coder > > > > > > > http://coders.talend.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > > > > > > > > > Talend Community Coder > > > > > > http://coders.talend.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > > > > > > > Talend Community Coder > > > > > http://coders.talend.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > > > > > Talend Community Coder > > > > http://coders.talend.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > > > Talend Community Coder > > > http://coders.talend.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > Talend Community Coder > > http://coders.talend.com > > > > > > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
