Yes, that fixed it.

Thanks,
Glen

On 09/04/2013 05:43 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Glen,

The requirement now is for the policy to explicitly state that no password
is required in the UsernameToken, which will be the case for key
derivation, e.g.:

<sp:ProtectionToken>
     <wsp:Policy>
         <sp:UsernameToken
             sp:IncludeToken="
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/AlwaysToRecipient
">
            <wsp:Policy>
                <sp:WssUsernameToken10/>
                <sp:NoPassword/>
           </wsp:Policy>
        </sp:UsernameToken>
    </wsp:Policy>
</sp:ProtectionToken>

There was a security bug in previous versions of CXF where it was allowing
a UsernameToken with no passwords just to handle the key derivation case.

Colm.


On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi, the following sample: https://github.com/gmazza/**
blog-samples/tree/master/cxf_**ut_messagelayer<https://github.com/gmazza/blog-samples/tree/master/cxf_ut_messagelayer>,
hardcoded to use CXF 2.7.3, works fine with UsernameToken over
Message-Layer Encryption (here, an X.509 symmetric key as explained in the
first part of this short blog article: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/**
entry/usernametoken_**messagelayer_encryption<http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/usernametoken_messagelayer_encryption>).
To confirm, all that needs to be done is to run "mvn clean install
tomcat7:run-war" from the cxf_ut_messagelayer base folder and "mvn
exec:exec" from the client subfolder.  However, once I upgrade
cxf_ut_messagelayer/pom.xml to CXF 2.7.4 or more recent (tried 2.7.5 and
2.7.6 as well), I get the following error upon running the client:

Sep 01, 2013 4:16:53 PM org.apache.cxf.phase.**PhaseInterceptorChain
doDefaultLogging
WARNING: Interceptor for {http://www.example.org/**contract/DoubleIt}**
DoubleItService#{http://www.**example.org/contract/DoubleIt}**DoubleIt<http://www.example.org/contract/DoubleIt%7DDoubleItService#%7Bhttp://www.example.org/contract/DoubleIt%7DDoubleIt>has
 thrown exception, unwinding now
org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.**SoapFault: The security token could not be
authenticated or authorized
     at org.apache.cxf.ws.security.**wss4j.WSS4JInInterceptor.**
createSoapFault(**WSS4JInInterceptor.java:788)
     at org.apache.cxf.ws.security.**wss4j.WSS4JInInterceptor.**
handleMessage(**WSS4JInInterceptor.java:336)
     at org.apache.cxf.ws.security.**wss4j.**PolicyBasedWSS4JInInterceptor.
**handleMessage(**PolicyBasedWSS4JInInterceptor.**java:120)
     at org.apache.cxf.ws.security.**wss4j.**PolicyBasedWSS4JInInterceptor.
**handleMessage(**PolicyBasedWSS4JInInterceptor.**java:105)
     at org.apache.cxf.phase.**PhaseInterceptorChain.**doIntercept(**
PhaseInterceptorChain.java:**271)
     at org.apache.cxf.transport.**ChainInitiationObserver.**onMessage(**
ChainInitiationObserver.java:**121)
     at org.apache.cxf.transport.http.**AbstractHTTPDestination.**invoke(**
AbstractHTTPDestination.java:**239)
.....
Caused by: org.apache.ws.security.**WSSecurityException: The security
token could not be authenticated or authorized
     at org.apache.ws.security.**validate.**UsernameTokenValidator.**
verifyUnknownPassword(**UsernameTokenValidator.java:**228)
     at org.apache.ws.security.**validate.**UsernameTokenValidator.**
validate(**UsernameTokenValidator.java:**110)
     at org.apache.ws.security.**processor.**UsernameTokenProcessor.**
handleUsernameToken(**UsernameTokenProcessor.java:**172)
     at org.apache.ws.security.**processor.**UsernameTokenProcessor.**
handleToken(**UsernameTokenProcessor.java:**67)
     at org.apache.ws.security.**WSSecurityEngine.**processSecurityHeader(*
*WSSecurityEngine.java:396)
     at org.apache.cxf.ws.security.**wss4j.WSS4JInInterceptor.**
handleMessage(**WSS4JInInterceptor.java:279)

Checking the dependencies via mvn dependency:tree, we upgrade from
Woodstox 4.1.4 to 4.2.0 between CXF 2.7.3 and CXF 2.7.4.  However, even if
I force the use of Woodstox 4.1.4 in CXF 2.7.4 I get the same error message
above.  I don't know if this is a regression in CXF or if there is some
configuration change that will require me to update my WSDL configuration.

Thanks,
Glen




Reply via email to