Hi, as for cxf 2.7.7, the following AbstractClient code:
prevents important failure information from bubbling up to a place where it could be more properly logged or dealt with. Wouldn't it be better to use the WebApplicationException constructor that accepts both a response and an exception? Kind regards -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/AbstractClient-convertToWebApplicationException-does-not-preserve-original-exception-tp5734930.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
