CXF supports referencing X.509 tokens via Thumbprint KeyIdentifier
references. I don't know why a section on thumbprint references was removed
from a draft version of the spec.

Colm.


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:12 PM, COURTAULT Francois <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry to ask again but I haven't received any response yet ...
>
> Best Regards.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: COURTAULT Francois
> Sent: lundi 10 février 2014 10:35
> To: '[email protected]'
> Cc: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: Blur between secpolicy 1.2 and X509 Token profile
>
> Hello guys,
>
> Any answer to my question ?
>
> Best Regards.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: COURTAULT Francois
> Sent: mercredi 5 février 2014 12:22
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Blur between secpolicy 1.2 and X509 Token profile
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am a little bit lost because In the security policy spec v1.2 (
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-os.html),
> there are several ways to reference a X509Token (§5.4.3) which are allowed:
> * <sp:RequireKeyIdentifierReference ... /> ?
> * <sp:RequireIssuerSerialReference ... /> ?
> * <sp:RequireEmbeddedTokenReference ... /> ?
> * <sp:RequireThumbprintReference ... /> ?
>
> But in the X509 Certificate Token Profile 1.1 draft (
> https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13383/wss-v1.1-spec-pr-x509TokenProfile-01.htm#_Toc105230346),
> the thumbprint references is described  (§3.2.4) whereas in the final specs
> either at
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/v1.1/wss-v1.1-spec-os-x509TokenProfile.pdfor at
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/wss-x509TokenProfile-v1.1.1.html,
> this section has disappeared.
>
> Do you know any reason for that ? Is the thumbprint reference still
> supported by the spec ?
>
> Best Regards.
>
> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for
> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
> transmitted virus
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to