Yes was referring exactly to that. So i just misunderstood it. Thanks again.
2014-03-19 11:32 GMT+01:00 Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]>: > There is no problem with using the interceptor approach here. I think you > are referring to different ways of using WS-Security, one via an "Action" > approach where you configure the interceptors with what to do, and one via > WS-SecurityPolicy which uses the policy to set up configuration. > > Colm. > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Alexander Savinov < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > Thanks for answer and i do have another question concerning this. > > > > So my Service WSDL do have a policy within for the IssuedToken. My ATS > > WSDL also have a policy > > for that. > > > > I would like to use the alternative with using the IssuedToken policy > from > > service and getting the SAML Token from ATS with interceptors. But as far > > as i am right from reading the Documentation, i can't use WS-Security > > approach and Interceptor approach together. So how do i use the > Interceptor > > approach here? > > > > I used getInInterceptors and getOutInterceptors to check whether there > any > > Interceptors for my Client and the Lists are empty. Will CXF use my own > > interceptor if i add it to the outgoingInterceptors? > > > > best regards > > > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com >
