On Jun 2, 2014, at 8:11 AM, Shankaralingam, Neelambal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > In my client I am trying to return the SOAPMessage response. So I have added > SAAJInInterceptor to the InInterceptors chain. > > If I enable SAAJInInterceptor it breaks the RPCInInterceptor at Line#170 > where the expected Qname comes with namespace the part qname is without > namespace. > Breaks in below check and throws a fault. Can you create a test case for this? The QName from the SOAP message definitely should not have a namespace here. Thus, I’m kind of curious where the bug is coming from. Is there a namespace in the message transferred on the wire? Is the message on the wire using some sort of default namespace? Dan > !qn.equals(part.getConcreteName()) > > Is it expected? How can I remove a particular interceptor from chain? > Can anyone share your thoughts? > > Regards, > Neela > This email (including any attachments) is proprietary to Aspect Software, > Inc. and may contain information that is confidential. If you have received > this message in error, please do not read, copy or forward this message. > Please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and destroy > any copies. You may not further disclose or distribute this email or its > attachments. -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
