Is there a way to ignore ALL mustUnderstand? E.g. not matter if the Consumer sends: "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.1.xsd" or: " http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd " or whatever.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> wrote: > You can just copy the approach the WSS4JInInterceptor does. In particular > take a look at the subclass: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=blob_plain;f=rt/ws/security/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/ws/security/wss4j/AbstractWSS4JInterceptor.java;hb=HEAD > > So write an interceptor that implements SoapInterceptor, and add in > something like: > > private static final Set<QName> HEADERS = new HashSet<QName>(); > static { > HEADERS.add(new QName(WSConstants.WSSE_NS, "Security")); > HEADERS.add(new QName(WSConstants.WSSE11_NS, "Security")); > } > } > > public Set<QName> getUnderstoodHeaders() { > return HEADERS; > } > > Colm. > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Frizz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have a Consumer that sends messages with Security enabled, so something > > like this: > > > > <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> > > <soap:Header> > > ... > > <wsse:Security xmlns:wsse=" > > > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd > > " > > xmlns:wsu=" > > > > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd > > " > > soap:mustUnderstand="1"> > > ... > > </wsse:Security> > > </soap:Header> > > ... > > </soap:Envelope> > > > > > > My Provider has NO Security enabled, but I'd like to process those > messages > > anyway (please don't ask why ;-) > > > > Of course I get a "MustUnderstand headers are not understood" exeption. > > > > Setting mustUnderstand="0" in the Consumer code would solve this problem > - > > but is not an option. > > > > Question: > > - Can I "patch" this mustUnderstand from 1 to 0 using an Interceptor on > the > > Provider side? > > - Could I use a dummy handler that marks ALL headers as 'understood'? How > > would I do this? > > > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com >
