Hi Daniel, it's attached to my first mail (on the other post), but maybe it has been removed by the mailing list system.
You can get it here : https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz-ZrfMHlBlHc3JIUVFqclBfcHZVSFFNQUxxMVR4SEFtWVJV/edit?usp=sharing Here is the original email : ####################################################################### Hi CXF ! I'm using CXF 2.7.0 to generate the client for the attached WSDL (de.zip) with the following options : <wsdlOption> <wsdl>${basedir}/src/main/resources/de.wsdl</wsdl> <extraargs> <extraarg>-xjc-Xts</extraarg> <extraarg>-autoNameResolution</extraarg> </extraargs> </wsdlOption> The generated client is missing argument on one operation, while if I use SOAPUI or another priopriatery tool, I can see the arguments. For example, with SOAPUI 4.5.2 : <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; xmlns:res="http://resourcequery.api.de.n2.tibco.com";> <soapenv:Header/> <soapenv:Body> <res:executeQuery model-version="-1" implementation="1"> <query>resource(name='tibco-admin')</query> </res:executeQuery> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> CXF generated client the following : public interface ResourceQueryService { /** * Execute a Resource Query Language (RQL) query to find a set of resources that match specific criteria. */ @WebResult(name = "resource", targetNamespace = "") @RequestWrapper(localName = "executeQuery", targetNamespace = " http://resourcequery.api.de.n2.tibco.com";, className = "com.tibco.n2.common.organisation.api.XmlExecuteQuery") @WebMethod(action = "executeQuery") @ResponseWrapper(localName = "executeQueryResponse", targetNamespace = " http://resourcequery.api.de.n2.tibco.com";, className ="com.tibco.n2.de.api.resourcequery.ExecuteQueryResponse") public java.util.List<com.tibco.n2.de.api.resourcequery.XmlSimpleResource> executeQuery() throws InvalidQueryFault, SecurityFault, InvalidOrgModelVersionFault, NoSuchNamedEntityFault, InvalidServiceRequestFault, InternalServiceFault; } where you can see that the executeQuery() has no argument. Any idea what's going wrong ? I would rather not touch the WSLD, so I wonder if there's some options available on CXF that would allow the parameters to be generated. What's weird is that there's other method signature quite more complexe that are generated successfully. I'll try to generated the client with the latest version of CXF, but last time I tried, It failed... (expected another thread for me on this subject then ;)) Thanks for your help, Thomas. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > We’d need to see the WSDL. > > Dan > > > On Jul 15, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Thomas Manson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks Daniel, > > > > Removing this dependencies did solve the problem. > > > > However, going for CXF 2.7.11 didn't solve my original problem described > > in this post: > > > > CXF do not generate operation parameters > > > > where the arguments of a method is not generated with CXF while it's > usable > > in SAOPUI and one other propriatary tool. > > > > Can you have a look ? > > > > Thanks, > > Thomas. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Remove the cxf-common-utilities dependency entirely. That hasn’t existed > >> for a long time. > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> On Jul 11, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Thomas Manson <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm trying to use a newer version of CXF to generate a client to see if > >> it solves an issue that I have with 2.7.0. > >>> > >>> > >>> I don't know where to find the equivalent of the following library used > >> in my pom.xml : > >>> > >>> <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>cxf-codegen-plugin</artifactId> > >>> > >>> <dependencies> > >>> > >>> <dependency> > >>> <groupId>org.apache.cxf.xjcplugins</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>cxf-xjc-ts</artifactId> > >>> <version>2.6.1</version> > >>> </dependency> > >>> <dependency> > >>> <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>cxf-common-utilities</artifactId> > >>> <version>2.5.10</version> > >>> </dependency> > >>> <dependency> > >>> <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId> > >>> <artifactId>cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb</artifactId> > >>> <version>2.7.5</version> > >>> </dependency> > >>> </dependencies> > >>> > >>> I've checked cxf-common-utilities on maven repo, it's one year old in > >> its last version 2.5.11, while CXF 2.7.11 has been released in April > this > >> year. > >>> > >>> Could you help me to sort out which version/maven artifact I should use > >> to have a consistent configuration and use the very last version of the > >> 2.7.X branch ? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Thomas. > >>> > >>> <pom.xml> > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >> > >> > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > >
