Prefix xsd is actually bound to the correct xsd namespace in that soap
fault message. So this message shouldn't be causing any parsing error
within CXF.
If your setup is extracting the fault part directly without including
the namespace declarations from its parent context, that could lead to
the parsing error when parsing the extracted part. Camel had this
issue with CXF 3.x sometime ago.
What does your scenario/application look like? You may need a similar
approach to injecting the namespaces.
regards, aki

2015-07-29 21:08 GMT+02:00 Andrew Cleasby <[email protected]>:
> I've created a SOAP service client from a WSDL and am having trouble getting
> fault/exception handling working.  The specific error I'm getting is:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: prefix xsd is not bound to a namespace
> (I can provide the full stacktrace if necessary.)
>
> This occurs when parsing the SOAP fault response:
> <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><soapenv:Envelope
> xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";><soapenv:Body><soapenv:Fault><faultcode>ServerFaultCode</faultcode><faultstring/><detail><RuntimeFaultFault
> xsi:type="vim25:InvalidArgument" xmlns="urn:pbm" xmlns:pbm="urn:pbm"
> xmlns:vim25="urn:vim25"><vim25:faultMessage><vim25:key>com.vmware.pbm.pbmFault.locale</vim25:key><vim25:arg><vim25:key>summary</vim25:key><vim25:value
> xsi:type="xsd:string">Invalid or null error
> message(vmodl.fault.InvalidArgument) {
>    faultCause = null,
>    faultMessage = null,
>    invalidProperty = resourceType
> }</vim25:value></vim25:arg></vim25:faultMessage><vim25:invalidProperty>resourceType</vim25:invalidProperty></RuntimeFaultFault></detail></soapenv:Fault></soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope>
>
>
>
> I'm using version 3.1.1.  I saw that
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6319 was fixed in 3.1.0 and up,
> but the problem I'm running into appears to be similar.  Can anyone suggest
> how to troubleshoot?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>

Reply via email to