Hi Aki

I tried but you said. The automatic WSDL that I got after deploying in WebLogic 
successfully is similar but not identical. In fact, mine is quite small.

And the important bit... In your wsdl, where you have:

<soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>

I have again:

<soap:body use="literal"/>

So clearly I am having the same problem again. I have no "parts" at all. Quite 
puzzling :)

Thanks
flx


-----Original Message-----
From: Aki Yoshida [mailto:elak...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 03 December 2015 14:29
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: CXF incorrect WSDL automatically generated ? Please help !

Hi Felix,
you'll have to check with weblogic people. we can't do nothing more from the 
cxf side.

maybe you can try the below test service with your web logic setup and see how 
it generates its wsdl.

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=blob;f=tools/javato/ws/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/tools/fortest/headers/SomeHeaders.java

and this is the expected wsdl by cxf.

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=blob;f=tools/javato/ws/src/test/resources/org/apache/cxf/tools/java2wsdl/processor/internal/jaxws/expected/expected_someheaders.wsdl

regards, aki


2015-12-03 11:27 GMT+01:00 Mercader, Felix <felix.merca...@firstdata.com>:
> Hi Aki
>
> Thank you very much for your interest and responses.
>
> As an update, as you suggested, I was able to update to cxf 3.0.7. I can't 
> use 3.1.4 at the moment as my webservice fails when I deploy in weblogic but 
> well, I am ok with this.
>
> I just did it again, without using the plain wsdl. I promise you that the 
> automatic generated wsdl is not included at all this "parts" attribute. I 
> really don't know why.
>
> Of course I have a web.xml file, a cxf-servlet.xml file... and this is the 
> first time I write a cxf servlet so maybe there is something wrong in my 
> code, who knows. But it works wonderfully now. Do you want me to send any 
> particular file/s to your particular address ? I can see the complete 
> automatic wsld or my cxf-servlet.xml or other code so you can check.
>
> Also I see some warnings in the WebLogic server when deploying/starting the 
> webservice. They say something about "Could not start WS-Discovery 
> Service"... I don't think this is related but I don't know, some classes 
> appear in the logs that I have no idea what they are.
>
> Thanks again for all your support, very much appreciated.
> flx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aki Yoshida [mailto:elak...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 03 December 2015 10:16
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CXF incorrect WSDL automatically generated ? Please help !
>
> to add to what i said below, as the generated wsdl in your cxf setup and the 
> plain cxf setup differs, i suspect that your cxf setup has some 
> inconsistency, either having a duplicate very old cxf version being picked up 
> that might have this incorrect behavior or something other than cxf is 
> generating your wsdl.
>
>
> 2015-12-03 11:03 GMT+01:00 Aki Yoshida <elak...@gmail.com>:
>> the cxf (including version 2.7.12) should be generating the parts 
>> attribute in that case and I don't understand why you needed to 
>> manually add it.
>>
>> i just tried your sample (only changed the return type from your 
>> custom type to String) with cxf-2.7.12 and I am getting the following 
>> binding element.
>>
>>   <wsdl:binding name="FelixSampleServiceSoapBinding" 
>> type="tns:FelixSamplePort">
>>     <soap:binding style="document"
>> transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
>>     <wsdl:operation name="getParent">
>>       <soap:operation soapAction="" style="document"/>
>>       <wsdl:input name="getParent">
>>         <soap:header message="tns:getParent" part="callerId" use="literal">
>>         </soap:header>
>>         <soap:header message="tns:getParent" part="timestamp" use="literal">
>>         </soap:header>
>>         <soap:header message="tns:getParent" part="signature" use="literal">
>>         </soap:header>
>>         <soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
>>       </wsdl:input>
>>       <wsdl:output name="getParentResponse">
>>         <soap:body use="literal"/>
>>       </wsdl:output>
>>     </wsdl:operation>
>>   </wsdl:binding>
>>
>> it has the parts parameter for the body element for this multi 
>> parameters operation.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-12-03 9:54 GMT+01:00 Mercader, Felix <felix.merca...@firstdata.com>:
>>> Daniel / Aki... thank you very very much !!! My problem is now fixed. My 
>>> webservice is working nice wonderfully and the header parameters are in the 
>>> header only, not in the body too anymore.
>>>
>>> Let me show you how I fixed and ask you one more question please.
>>>
>>> Daniel, you were totally right about the "parts" attribute not boing 
>>> in my WSDL. So this is how I fixed, changing
>>>
>>> <soap:body use="literal">
>>>
>>> To
>>>
>>> <soap:body use="literal" parts="parameters"/>
>>>
>>> Even with this change, if I use now the online wsdl validator 
>>> (https://www.wsdl-analyzer.com/), it tells me everything is fine in my wsdl 
>>> now !
>>>
>>> Now I am investigating a bit more about this parts attribute. But let me 
>>> ask you... It is an automatic generated WSDL. And I really would like NOT 
>>> to do any manual change to the WSDL. So why this attribute was not in the 
>>> wsdl ? I needed your help to fix it. It does not seem obvious to me.
>>>
>>> This attribute is not appearing to me when deploying in WebLogic. Is this 
>>> the desired behaviour ? is it a bug ?
>>>
>>> In other words, the question I really want to ask: can I do any change in 
>>> the java code of my cxf web service so this attribute will appear so I 
>>> don't need to do any manual change to the WSDL ?
>>>
>>> This is my current code for this getParent call:
>>>
>>>     @WebResult (name="merchantHierarchyParentResponse") 
>>> MerchantHierarchyParentResponseDTO
>>>     getParent(
>>>             @WebParam(name="institutionNumber") @XmlElement(required=true) 
>>> String institutionNumber,
>>>             @WebParam(name="clientNumber") String clientNumber,
>>>             @WebParam(name="ourReference") String ourReference,
>>>             @WebParam(name="accessMerch") String accessMerch,
>>>             @WebParam(header=true, name="callerId") String callerId,
>>>             @WebParam(header=true, name="timestamp") String timestamp,
>>>             @WebParam(header=true, name="signature") String signature
>>>     );
>>>
>>> Thank you a million !!! You both helped me loads !
>>>
>>> flx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: 02 December 2015 16:49
>>> To: users@cxf.apache.org; Mercader, Felix
>>> Subject: Re: CXF incorrect WSDL automatically generated ? Please help !
>>>
>>> This would be a bug in the that wsdl analyzer tool.   Having multiple parts 
>>> in the message is fine as long as only one of those parts is used for the 
>>> soap:body.
>>>
>>> However, looking at the requirements from:
>>> http://ws-i.org/profiles/basicprofile-2.0-2010-11-09.html#WSDLMSGS
>>>
>>> I think the bug is around R2210.   The soap:body in your wsdl isn’t having 
>>> the “parts” on it at all.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyway, my more complete question is:  what does a CXF client (or the 
>>> JAX-WS RI client) generate for the soap message.  This could also be a bug 
>>> in SOAPUI.    I believe both the RI and CXF will properly recognize that 
>>> those parts are headers and not put them in the body.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Mercader, Felix <felix.merca...@firstdata.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Aki
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a million for your support ! Please help me again with what I 
>>>> discovered below:
>>>>
>>>> To answer your questions, this is how it looks the wsdl:operation element 
>>>> under the wsdl:binding element:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    <wsdl:binding name="ServiceImplServiceSoapBinding" type="tns:IService">
>>>>        <soap:binding style="document" 
>>>> transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
>>>>        <wsdl:operation name="getParent">
>>>>            <soap:operation soapAction="" style="document"/>
>>>>            <wsdl:input name="getParent">
>>>>                <soap:header encodingStyle="" message="tns:getParent" 
>>>> part="callerId" use="literal"/>
>>>>                <soap:header encodingStyle="" message="tns:getParent" 
>>>> part="timestamp" use="literal"/>
>>>>                <soap:header encodingStyle="" message="tns:getParent" 
>>>> part="signature" use="literal"/>
>>>>                <soap:body use="literal"/>
>>>>            </wsdl:input>
>>>>            <wsdl:output name="getParentResponse">
>>>>                <soap:body use="literal"/>
>>>>            </wsdl:output>
>>>>        </wsdl:operation>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And now, let me add something I found that I think it can be very 
>>>> interesting. I found this website in the Internet:
>>>> https://www.wsdl-analyzer.com/
>>>>
>>>> If I put my WSDL (the one generated in WebLogic, I did not change 
>>>> anything!). It tells me it has one error for each of the calls that the 
>>>> WebService is offering. In this case, for the getParent is telling me this 
>>>> as an error:
>>>>
>>>>       The operation 'getParent' uses the message 'getParent' which has 
>>>> more than one part.
>>>>
>>>> The getParent in the WSDL is as following:
>>>>
>>>>    <wsdl:message name="getParent">
>>>>        <wsdl:part element="tns:getParent" name="parameters"/>
>>>>        <wsdl:part element="tns:callerId" name="callerId"/>
>>>>        <wsdl:part element="tns:timestamp" name="timestamp"/>
>>>>        <wsdl:part element="tns:signature" name="signature"/>
>>>>    </wsdl:message>
>>>>
>>>> So it has "more than one part". Then I did this change (manual change 
>>>> which I really wouldn't like to do any manual change, but just as a test):
>>>>
>>>>            <xs:element name="getParentType" type="tns:getParentType"/>
>>>>            <xs:complexType name="getParentType">
>>>>                <xs:sequence>
>>>>                    <xs:element name="parameters" type="tns:getParent"/>
>>>>                    <xs:element name="callerId" type="tns:callerId"/>
>>>>                    <xs:element name="timestamp" type="tns:timestamp"/>
>>>>                    <xs:element name="signature" type="tns:signature"/>
>>>>                </xs:sequence>
>>>>            </xs:complexType>
>>>>
>>>>               ...
>>>>
>>>>           <wsdl:message name="getParent">
>>>>               <wsdl:part element="tns:getParentType" name="Wrapper"/>
>>>>           </wsdl:message>
>>>>
>>>> So now the getParent is only 1 part. And in fact, if I use the website 
>>>> https://www.wsdl-analyzer.com/, now it tells me that the WSDL is correct. 
>>>> But unfortulately, if I deploy the WebService in WebLogic pointing to this 
>>>> local and manually changed WSDL (adding wsdlLocation="..." in my 
>>>> cxf_servlet.xml file)... then it fails at deploying time in WebLogic with 
>>>> a strange java.lang.NullPointerException:
>>>>
>>>> <02-Dec-2015 16:14:18 o'clock GMT> <Error> <HTTP> <BEA-101216> <Servlet: 
>>>> "cxf" failed to preload on startup in Web application: 
>>>> "omniWebService_VAPP_war_exploded".
>>>> org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error 
>>>> creating bean with name 'omniWebService': Invocation of init method 
>>>> failed; nested exception is javax.xml.ws.WebSe
>>>> rviceException: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1422)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:518)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:455)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory$1.getObject(AbstractBeanFactory.java:293)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:222)
>>>>        Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace Caused By:
>>>> javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl.doPublish(EndpointImpl.java:371)
>>>>        at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl.publish(EndpointImpl.java:251)
>>>>        at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl.publish(EndpointImpl.java:539)
>>>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>        at 
>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:88)
>>>>        Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace Caused By:
>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.common.util.ASMHelper.getClassCode(ASMHelper.java:209)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.WrapperClassGenerator.generateMessagePart(WrapperClassGenerator.java:310)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.WrapperClassGenerator.createWrapperClass(WrapperClassGenerator.java:224)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.WrapperClassGenerator.generate(WrapperClassGenerator.java:132)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.support.JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.generatedWrapperBeanClass(JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.java:683)
>>>>        Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
>>>>>
>>>> <02-Dec-2015 16:14:18 o'clock GMT> <Error> <Deployer> <BEA-149265> 
>>>> <Failure occurred in the execution of deployment request with ID 
>>>> "24274166714283537" for task "127". Error is:
>>>> "weblogic.application.ModuleException: java.lang.NullPointerException"
>>>> weblogic.application.ModuleException: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>        at 
>>>> weblogic.application.internal.ExtensibleModuleWrapper.start(ExtensibleModuleWrapper.java:140)
>>>>        at 
>>>> weblogic.application.internal.flow.ModuleListenerInvoker.start(ModuleListenerInvoker.java:124)
>>>>        at 
>>>> weblogic.application.internal.flow.ModuleStateDriver$3.next(ModuleStateDriver.java:216)
>>>>        at 
>>>> weblogic.application.internal.flow.ModuleStateDriver$3.next(ModuleStateDriver.java:211)
>>>>        at 
>>>> weblogic.application.utils.StateMachineDriver.nextState(StateMachineDriver.java:42)
>>>>        Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace Caused By:
>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.common.util.ASMHelper.getClassCode(ASMHelper.java:209)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.WrapperClassGenerator.generateMessagePart(WrapperClassGenerator.java:310)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.WrapperClassGenerator.createWrapperClass(WrapperClassGenerator.java:224)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.WrapperClassGenerator.generate(WrapperClassGenerator.java:132)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.cxf.jaxws.support.JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.generatedWrapperBeanClass(JaxWsServiceFactoryBean.java:683)
>>>>        Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
>>>>>
>>>> <02-Dec-2015 16:14:18 o'clock GMT> <Error> <Deployer> <BEA-149202> 
>>>> <Encountered an exception while attempting to commit the 9 task for 
>>>> the application "omniWebService_VAPP_war_e xploded".>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any help with this please ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> flx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Aki Yoshida [mailto:elak...@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: 02 December 2015 15:14
>>>> To: users@cxf.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: CXF incorrect WSDL automatically generated ? Please help !
>>>>
>>>> cxf-2.7.12 isn't so old and it shouldn't be generating the wrong wsdl for 
>>>> the headers.
>>>> how does the corresponding wsdl:operation element under the wsdl:binding 
>>>> element look like?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-12-02 13:33 GMT+01:00 Mercader, Felix <felix.merca...@firstdata.com>:
>>>>> Thanks Aki
>>>>>
>>>>> I am using CXF version 2.7.12
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Aki Yoshida [mailto:elak...@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: 02 December 2015 12:26
>>>>> To: users@cxf.apache.org
>>>>> Cc: Mercader, Felix
>>>>> Subject: Re: CXF incorrect WSDL automatically generated ? Please help !
>>>>>
>>>>> which cxf version are you using?
>>>>> it could be an old bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> Questions should go to users@cxf, so I have moved this thread to there..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-12-02 13:07 GMT+01:00 Felix.1973 <felix.merca...@omnipaygroup.com>:
>>>>>> Hi there. I am fighting the last two days with the same problem 
>>>>>> and I don't know how to fix this. Even not sure if it is an error or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a CXF Web Service with something I consider very strange 
>>>>>> and I would like to fix. This is one of the calls that the Web Service 
>>>>>> deals with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    @WebResult (name="merchantHierarchyParentResponse")
>>>>>> MerchantHierarchyParentResponseDTO
>>>>>>    getParent(
>>>>>>            @WebParam(name="institutionNumber")
>>>>>> @XmlElement(required=true) String institutionNumber,
>>>>>>            @WebParam(name="clientNumber") String clientNumber,
>>>>>>            @WebParam(name="ourReference") String ourReference,
>>>>>>            @WebParam(name="accessMerch") String accessMerch,
>>>>>>            @WebParam(header=true, name="callerId") String callerId,
>>>>>>            @WebParam(header=true, name="timestamp") String timestamp,
>>>>>>            @WebParam(header=true, name="signature") String signature
>>>>>>    );
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you can see, it receives 4 normal parameters plus 3 extra 
>>>>>> parameters in the header (callerId, timestamp and signature).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It compiles successfully. Then I deploy it also successfully in a 
>>>>>> WebLogic server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, I use SoapUI to test it. I provide SoapUI with the URL 
>>>>>> that WebLogic is providing me with the WSDL. This is, I am not 
>>>>>> doing any change in the automatic generated WSDL. This is what I 
>>>>>> am getting for this getParent in SoupUI:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <soapenv:Envelope 
>>>>>> xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
>>>>>> xmlns:web="http://webService.webservice.omnipay.com.server/";>
>>>>>>   <soapenv:Header>
>>>>>> *      <web:signature>?</web:signature>
>>>>>>      <web:timestamp>?</web:timestamp>
>>>>>>      <web:callerId>?</web:callerId>*
>>>>>>   </soapenv:Header>
>>>>>>   <soapenv:Body>
>>>>>>      <web:getParent>
>>>>>>         <institutionNumber>?</institutionNumber>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         <clientNumber>?</clientNumber>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         <ourReference>?</ourReference>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         <accessMerch>?</accessMerch>
>>>>>>      </web:getParent>
>>>>>> /*      <web:callerId>?</web:callerId>
>>>>>>      <web:timestamp>?</web:timestamp>
>>>>>>      <web:signature>?</web:signature>*/
>>>>>>   </soapenv:Body>
>>>>>> </soapenv:Envelope>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My question is very clear. I see the 3 parameters in the header 
>>>>>> section (callerId, timestamp and signature) but why these 3 
>>>>>> parameters are *AGAIN* at the end in the body part ??? I don't 
>>>>>> want them in the body part, I want them only in the header.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any idea why this is happening ? Is that normal ? is it a bug ?
>>>>>> Thank you for your help !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>> Felix Mercader
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-incorrect-WSDL-automatically-
>>>>>> g en e r ated-Please-help-tp5763489.html Sent from the cxf-dev 
>>>>>> mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, 
>>>>> and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the 
>>>>> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering 
>>>>> this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
>>>>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
>>>>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
>>>>> notify First Data immediately by replying to this message and deleting it 
>>>>> from your computer.
>>>>
>>>> The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, 
>>>> and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the 
>>>> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering 
>>>> this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
>>>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
>>>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
>>>> notify First Data immediately by replying to this message and deleting it 
>>>> from your computer.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - 
>>> http://coders.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>> The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and 
>>> protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the 
>>> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
>>> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
>>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
>>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
>>> First Data immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from 
>>> your computer.
>
> The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and 
> protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to 
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
> have received this communication in error, please notify First Data 
> immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer.

The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and 
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this communication in error, please notify First Data immediately 
by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer.

Reply via email to