2016-08-25 16:58 GMT+04:00 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>: > https://www.w3.org/Submission/wadl/#x3-90002.4 > > states the WADL grammar "acts as a container for definitions of the format > of data exchanged during execution..." - this implies the > 'wadl:representation'. > > These other parameters should really refer to some existing primitive > types defined in XML schema. > > I don't think it is realistic or worth the effort to go the route of > introspecting schema types in case the non-representation parameters decide > to refer to some of WADL grammar elements and then adding all these various > BeanVal annotations because as I said IMHO it will overload what WADL > grammar is for. > > If WADL submission ever gets further and we see the future versions saying > yes the non-representation parameters can refer to WADL grammar then we can > revisit this enhancement request. > > Adding only @Valid seems realistic though >
Yes, this is "quick win" to allow JSR303 validation work with wadl2java
