Hi Regina, (feedback to a spec! I love communities :)
First: Nothing of this is nailed down. There are other ways to implement this (at least in a "solution compatible way"), so I highly appreciate every feedback. > I have read the document. I understand it in this way: You will make > queries automatically convert to views to use the already existing > feature, that queries on views are possible and you tell the user that > this view would be a "query" but in reality it is a view. Why that > effort? Why mix up the terms? Well ... you won't like this argueing ;) ... because people keep screaming for queries in queries. Of course we could simply make views editable (which in fact is what is internally going in), but even then, I'm pretty sure a lot of MSA users will keep saying "I want queries in queries, MSA has it". Even if you tell them they can do the very same thing by creating a view, and editing it if necessary, they will continue. That's basically the main idea behind the proposed architecture. However, as said, this is not nailed down, so keep your arguments coming :) Thanks & Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Database http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
