hi michael, i've pushed the change (+ a test for it). -> with v1.0.1 it will be possible to use @ViewMetaData for your stereotype to keep the annotation itself as meta-data.
regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2014-07-02 22:15 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: > hi michael, > > what you would need is the support of stereotypes which are annotated with > @ViewMetaData as well. > currently that isn't supported that way. > > for now you could split it - e.g: > @Admin > @SecurityLevel(42) > > you are welcome to file a jira-ticket for the corresponding improvement. > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - > JavaEE Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2014-07-02 21:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Glauche <[email protected]>: > > Hi, >> >> i'm trying to apply the DS (1.0.0) security example (Wildfly 8.1.0, weld, >> MyFaces 2.0.18) to the JSF module, specifically the @Secured and >> Stereotypes with custom Meta-data. >> >> So, i did create: >> >> @Stereotype >> @Secured(RoleAccessDecisionVoter.class) >> public @interface Admin >> { >> int securityLevel(); >> } >> >> When i use that annotation on a bean everything works fine: >> public class RoleAccessDecisionVoter implements AccessDecisionVoter >> { >> private static final long serialVersionUID = >> -8007511215776345835L; >> >> public Set<SecurityViolation> checkPermission(AccessDecisionVoterContext >> voterContext) >> { >> Admin admin = voterContext.getMetaDataFor(Admin.class.getName(), >> Admin.class); >> >> does work, and will return the securitylevel from the bean. >> >> But, when i use the annotation in the JSF views, the @Secured is working, >> but the Annotation is not >> found in the voterContext. >> >> public interface Pages { >> class Index implements ViewConfig { } >> >> @Admin(securityLevel=42) >> class Admin implements ViewConfig { } >> } >> >> in this case "admin" in the checkPermission is null ... >> >> Am i missing something obvious? Is it supposed to work this way? >> >> Kind regards, >> Michael >> >> >> >> >
