Karl,

Do you mean you're trying to maintain the state of the view scoped bean in
the async request?

John

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:10 AM Karl Kildén <[email protected]> wrote:

> So it is impossible then :-)
>
> The problem is that several slow things needs to be done from a JSF Bean. I
> can't async it because the service the bean calls is @ViewAccessScoped and
> stateful.
>
> I have a Bean that I want to start the thread from the Bean it is not a
> problem but when I create a new thread this thread is also disconnected
> from my Bean and it fails to look it up...
>
> Will take me ages to fix this project properly so desperate times calls for
> strange hacks :-)
>
> On 21 June 2016 at 12:39, Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > BeanProvider should work fine with any scope.
> > Of course you can't receive a viewscoped bean from another
> thread/request.
> >
> > 2016-06-21 11:52 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > I have a RequestScoped Bean that needs to split the workload basically
> > and
> > > the thread needs to lookup using the Bean that starts the thread so to
> > > speak...
> > >
> > > On 21 June 2016 at 11:24, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > If a project made a mistake in the architecture and needs to lookup
> JSF
> > > > scoped instances from the BeanProvider, is this possible in any way
> > > > (however hacky?).
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that since the request thread is needed to lookup the
> > > > instance it does not work from a thread.
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to