Hi Colin,

Thanks for clarifying that. As I'm on vacation I did even tried to use
1.8.1, but AFAIK it shouldn't work.

LA

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Astley, Colin (C.J.) <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm writing to let you know that I tested 1.8.x with our applications and
> it works. I replied on the '@Repository and @CacheResult(cacheName =
> "my-cache")' thread above when someone else asked about a 1.8.2 release but
> it might have gotten buried. That is quite an active thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Colin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Astley, Colin (C.J.)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 4:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Could there be a final Java 6 version of DeltaSpike released?
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I'll try it out and let you know. Thanks alot for your help.
>
> Colin
> ________________________________________
> From: Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 4:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Could there be a final Java 6 version of DeltaSpike released?
>
> I backported the both mentioned issues.
> Gerhard also did some backports of other features.
>
> Would you please give it a try? It's the 1.8.x branch.
> If everything works fine, we could trigger a release.
>
> 2018-03-26 22:38 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>:
>
> > +1 for your suggestion
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-03-26 17:51 GMT+02:00 Astley, Colin (C.J.) <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Would you be willing to release a final Java 6 binary compatible
> > > version of DeltaSpike? Possibly a version 1.8.2? We are currently
> > > using version 1.8.0. We are unable to move to version 1.8.1 because
> > > it doesn't run on
> > WAS
> > > 8. Thomas made a code change after 1.8.1 was released that I tested
> > > with WAS 8 and it worked. With your upcoming move to Java 8 I'm
> > > wondering if
> > his
> > > fix can be made available in one final Java 6 release that will run
> > > in
> > WAS
> > > 8's stock JRE 6.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your consideration,
> > >
> > > Colin
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to