Hi, On 4/23/07, CORUM, M E [AG/1000] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Just an aside on the issue of not being able to load the ldif file on startup in Windows. It appears to be somehow related to the filename itself. I found that if the ldif filename started with "ad", then the weird parsing took place and it always failed. Perhaps this is an issue that only occurs on Windows.)
Oh? Very strange... Maybe we have hardcoded a method to reject everithing containing AD on windows ;). Nahhh. Ok, can you post us a failing ldif file starting with ad ? Since I was trying to do Kerberos anyway, I found that
kerberos-example.ldif file and modified it for my environment. I was able to get it loaded. I am using a different domain than example.com so I'm wondering if something in the server is hard-coded to example.com.
No. We have a server.xml file which contains the configuration for this partition, but nothing more. I had lots of trouble getting it to recognize anything
other than example.com. I do have a partition matching my new domain and was able to load the file from the startup and verify the entries in JXplorer.
Modifying the name in server.xml should be enough. If you had specific troubles, then let us know. May be the doco is not good enough, and doco is part of the product, so... <snip/> Just because I don't know anyhing about the kerberos part. Enrique, you around ? Now, here is the bad part. When I switch log4j.properties to have DEBUG
as the log level, the server WON'T START!
yeah, this is a *bad* bug we have in 1.5.0. It has been fixed in trunks, so I engage you to download the sources and build the server. here are the instructions to do so : http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/building-trunks.html Sorry about that :( When I flip back to INFO, the server starts fine but I can't get the
deep details in the log. Can anybody help?
Hope I did, but if it's not enough, just ask again. By the way, I'm wondering if the default algorithm for the key is
different. I'm on Windows and use to using 23. I noticed that the Krb5EncryptionType is 3 rather than 23 in the directory so I'll look into that to see if that is my problem with Kerberos.
Enrique again ? MikeC -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
