Hmmm don't remember. Feel free to point me in the direction of the latest and greatest and I'll upgrade it.
Alex On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Pierre Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To which samba version does the samba schema adhere? > > > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Pierre Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Reinstall the server, set m-disabled for nis to FALSE and then set > > m-disabled for samba to FALSE did the trick. Samba objects classes are > now > > available. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Pierre Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> I see that nis (which is has m-oid= 1.3.6.1.1.1.1.0) has m-disabled = > >> true, but see no way to change te value. > >> > >> Do you know how I could go about it? > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Jeroen Vriesman < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> maybe the schema defining attribute type 1.3.6.1.1.1.1.0 is disabled? > >>> > >>> Looking at the samba schema I see: > >>> m-dependencies: system > >>> m-dependencies: core > >>> m-dependencies: inetorgperson > >>> m-dependencies: nis > >>> > >>> did you also set m-disabled=FALSE in inetorgperson and nis? > >>> > >>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Pierre Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > The verion I am using is apacheds 1.5.2 with jvm 1.5. > >>> > > >>> > It happened both on the linux and the windows version. > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Give me some information to go on: platform, jvm, and ApacheDS > >>> version. > >>> > > Also turn on debugging after clearing out the log file and send it > >>> over. > >>> > > > >>> > > Alex > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Pierre Smits < > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > When enabling the samba schema via above mentioned method and > >>> > restarting > >>> > > > the > >>> > > > server again, I get following error message: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Error while opening connection > >>> > > > [LDAP: error code 80 - failed on search operation: attributeType > w/ > >>> OID > >>> > > > 1.3.6.1.1.1.1.0 not registered!] > >>> > > > [LDAP: error code 80 - failed on search operation: attributeType > >>> w/ > >>> > OID > >>> > > > 1.3.6.1.1.1.1.0 not registered!] > >>> > > > Error occurred while loading schema, using default schema > >>> > > > > >>> > > > How do I correct this? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Regards, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Pierre > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Jeroen Vriesman < > >>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > > > > >>> > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > I had the same problem some time ago, > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > under cn=admin,ou=shema you can see that "m-disabled" is TRUE, > >>> set it > >>> > > to > >>> > > > > FALSE > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > By the way, another question for the rest of us, is there an > easy > >>> way > >>> > > to > >>> > > > > convert the openldap schema's to apachds (is it enough to > convert > >>> > them > >>> > > > and > >>> > > > > add them under ou=schema?) > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > what I want is to take the file of an openldap schema and just > >>> > ldap-add > >>> > > > > some > >>> > > > > converted stuff to apache on the commandline, is there such a > >>> > > converter? > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Pierre Smits < > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > > > >>> > > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > I am testing the 1.5.2 windows version. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > When accessing the running ds service with apache studio I > see > >>> the > >>> > > > samba > >>> > > > > > schema. However, when creating new entries I cannot select > >>> samba > >>> > > > objects. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > How do I make the samba schema available in the list of > >>> selectable > >>> > > > > > objects? > >>> > > > > > Do I need to configure something? > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regards, > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Pierre > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >
