It seems that the real problem is with the way we handle the uniqueMember AT.
groupOfUniqueNames requires a uniqueMember and a cn groupOfNames requires a member and a cn. uniqueMember's Syntax is nameAndOptionalUID, when member's Syntax is DN. I will check what's going wrong with the nameAndOptionalUID's uniqueMemberMatch matchingrule. On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:04 PM, SCHEDENIG Marian < [email protected]> wrote: > > From: SCHEDENIG Marian [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Freitag, 27. November 2009 15:50 > > > > Sorry for forgetting to mention the version: ApacheDS 1.5.5 (through > > Maven). > > Sorry for bumping my own thread, but can anyone shed some light on this? > > This fails with an exception: > (uniqueMember=uid=figaro,ou=users,o=infinica) > > But if I change my data model to use groupOfNames instead of > groupOfUniqueNames, the following query works fine: > (member=uid=figaro,ou=users,o=infinica) > > So it really seems to be a problem with groupOfUniqueNames. > > Thx, > Marian. > > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
